2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0500-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo CRISPR editing with no detectable genome-wide off-target mutations

Abstract: CRISPR-Cas genome-editing nucleases hold substantial promise for developing human therapeutic applications but identifying unwanted off-target mutations is important for clinical translation. A well-validated method that can reliably identify off-targets in vivo has not been described to date, which means it is currently unclear whether and how frequently these mutations occur. Here we describe 'verification of in vivo off-targets' (VIVO), a highly sensitive strategy that can robustly identify the genome-wide … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
206
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
206
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…VIVO is a very sensitive in vivo method which robustly detects off‐target effects caused by CRISPR/Cas nucleases in a genome‐wide scale . VIVO has been tested in vivo where a gRNA was deliberately designed with random sequence to check whether Cas9 can induce bona fide off‐targets in mouse livers.…”
Section: Methods/techniques To Detect Off‐target Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…VIVO is a very sensitive in vivo method which robustly detects off‐target effects caused by CRISPR/Cas nucleases in a genome‐wide scale . VIVO has been tested in vivo where a gRNA was deliberately designed with random sequence to check whether Cas9 can induce bona fide off‐targets in mouse livers.…”
Section: Methods/techniques To Detect Off‐target Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VIVO demonstrated that correctly designed gRNAs can direct the efficient in vivo editing in mouse livers without any detectable off‐target mutations. VIVO is therefore suitable to define and quantify the off‐target mutations of Cas9 proteins in whole organisms …”
Section: Methods/techniques To Detect Off‐target Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas most CRISPR approaches harnessed the DNA double‐strand break inducing Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) nuclease variants, we have recently developed double nicking approaches based on single‐strand DNA breaks (nicks) at the targeting site with the intention to reduce off‐target site effects . Compared to the extremely high numbers of off‐target site modifications inherent to replacement gene therapies resulting from multiple random integrations in the treated cells, off‐target mutations are rare or non‐existent upon designer nuclease treatment …”
Section: From Replacement Gene Therapy To Precision Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compounding onto this highly convoluted problem is our imperfect understanding of genetic dynamics at the current moment, especially concerning pleiotropic effects. Even if genetic editing, by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) or other technologies, were to be free of off‐target errors—a goal towards which rapid progress is being made—great caution should be exercised in considering the eco‐evolutionary implications of our modifications. The enormous potential of biotechnology demands equivalent care and responsibility as research efforts continue.…”
Section: Recent Developments Reveal Broader Relevance With Nested Patmentioning
confidence: 99%