1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2396(19990615)32:4<254::aid-syn2>3.0.co;2-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo CRF release in rat amygdala is increased during cocaine withdrawal in self-administering rats

Abstract: Previous studies have suggested a role for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) in the aversive and anxiogenic effects of withdrawal from opiates and ethanol. To test whether this role of CRF extends to cocaine withdrawal as well, the release of CRF in rat amygdala was monitored by intracranial microdialysis during a 12-hour session of intravenous cocaine self-administration and subsequent 12-hour cocaine withdrawal period. Cocaine self-administration tended to lowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
71
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One such site is the basolateral amygdala where opioid receptors are more abundant (Paden et al 1987;Ding et al 1996) and may also mediate ethanol reinforcement (Hyytiä and Kiianmaa 2001). However, we hypothesized that we would observe ethanol-induced increases in opioid peptides in the CeA and we used established coordinates to do so (Merlo-Pich et al 1995;Richter and Weiss 1999;Roberto et al 2004). Thus, a significant amount of our sampling was in the CeA and any one dose group was ensured not to have probes that deviated predominantly from the target site according to our histological assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One such site is the basolateral amygdala where opioid receptors are more abundant (Paden et al 1987;Ding et al 1996) and may also mediate ethanol reinforcement (Hyytiä and Kiianmaa 2001). However, we hypothesized that we would observe ethanol-induced increases in opioid peptides in the CeA and we used established coordinates to do so (Merlo-Pich et al 1995;Richter and Weiss 1999;Roberto et al 2004). Thus, a significant amount of our sampling was in the CeA and any one dose group was ensured not to have probes that deviated predominantly from the target site according to our histological assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Research substantiating this hypothesis includes findings that extracellular CRF levels are increased in the central amygdala during cocaine, ethanol, cannabinoid, and opioid withdrawal in rats (Richter and Weiss 1999;Merlo-Pich et al 1995;Rodriguez de Fonseca et al 1997;Weiss et al 2001, respectively) and that tissue content levels of CRF in the amygdala are depleted during withdrawal from cocaine or ethanol Funk et al 2006). CRF antagonists have been found to reduce negative emotional states during withdrawal from cocaine (Basso et al 1999, Przegalinski et al 2005, methamphetamine (Moffet and Goeders 2007), nicotine (Bruijnzeel et al 2007), and ethanol (Baldwin et al 1991, Rassnick et al 1993Menzaghi et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, one may speculate that the loading phase is more sensitive than the maintenance phase of the 1-h test session, as presumably, the loading phase would reflect an attempt to reverse the hypothesized increase in CRF activity observed during cocaine withdrawal (Richter and Weiss 1999). However, further analysis of the effect of the CRF 1 antagonists on cocaine intake by LgA rats during the loading and the maintenance phases showed no significant interaction between the antagonist dose and phase intake in LgA rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The role of regional changes in CRF actions in this apparent shift remains to be determined. In contrast to stressor-induced reinstatement which appears to involve CRF in the VTA and/or BNST, CRF in the central nucleus of the amygdala, which is markedly elevated during acute withdrawal (Richter and Weiss 1999;Zorrilla et al 2001;Zhou et al 2003), appears to underlie the anxiety associated with acute withdrawal (Sarnyai et al 1995;Basso et al 1999). Therefore, it is possible that distinct CRF systems subserving aversive vs appetitive functions are differentially regulated by repeated cocaine in a way that contributes to the temporally dynamic profile of stressor responsiveness during withdrawal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%