2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo computed tomography evaluation of the composition of the carcass and main cuts of growing pigs of three commercial crossbreeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crosses that do not include Pietrain (LL-F and LL-F) presented in general a lower weight of the muscles, especially at higher TBW. This is in agreement with the work of Fisher et al (2003) and Carabús et al (2014) where the ham muscles of several genetic types were studied. This makes sense since Pietrain is a highly conformed breed, whose carcasses have higher ham weight, ham lean content and loin lean content, although not loin weight (Gispert et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crosses that do not include Pietrain (LL-F and LL-F) presented in general a lower weight of the muscles, especially at higher TBW. This is in agreement with the work of Fisher et al (2003) and Carabús et al (2014) where the ham muscles of several genetic types were studied. This makes sense since Pietrain is a highly conformed breed, whose carcasses have higher ham weight, ham lean content and loin lean content, although not loin weight (Gispert et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, it seems that the growth of these muscles, at higher weights, is higher in the present work, probably due to differences in the genotypes used. Moreover, the allometric coefficients for ham (0.89-0.95) and loin (0.97) muscle weight with respect to the live weight of the pig were close to one in agreement with previous works that reported allometric coefficients between 0.87 and 1.13 for ham muscle and 1.01 and 1.03 for loin muscle (Carabús et al, 2014, Carabús et al, 2017.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Measurements similar to the ones used by Carabús et al (2014) were obtained manually from different tomograms, and are graphically visualised in Figure 1. More detailed information about the measures can be found in Supplementary Table S1.…”
Section: Animals and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segmentation method should be simple and/ or well automated. Some methods using different measurements as muscle or fat thicknesses, perimeters and areas (Jones et al, 2002;Lambe et al, 2013;Carabús et al, 2014;Matics et al, 2014;Fonti-Furnols et al, 2015) on the scans. These results were obtained semi-automatically or manually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%