2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2008.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo characterization of estrogen receptor modulators with reduced genomic versus nongenomic activity in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The clear distinctions we observed between responses in endothelium, uterus, and breast cancer in mice indicate that non-nuclear ER signaling is indeed a means of differential tissue responsiveness to estrogen in vivo, as has been suggested in previous in vivo studies of the impact on bone mineralization of ER ligands with reduced nuclear activity in vitro (43).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The clear distinctions we observed between responses in endothelium, uterus, and breast cancer in mice indicate that non-nuclear ER signaling is indeed a means of differential tissue responsiveness to estrogen in vivo, as has been suggested in previous in vivo studies of the impact on bone mineralization of ER ligands with reduced nuclear activity in vitro (43).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…91 Similarly, synthetic estrogen-like compounds, which selectively activate kinases but have weak genomic effects, have far more potent effects on bone than on the uterus and breast, and also reproduce the vasodilatory effect of estradiol. 92,93 …”
Section: Molecular Mechanisms Of Erα Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective activation of non-nuclear initiated actions of the ER dissociates the beneficial effects of estrogens on bone from their effects on reproductive organs [53-59]. This contention has been recently tested using an estrogen-dendrimer conjugate (EDC) that cannot enter the cell nucleus but it is very effective in stimulating non-nuclear signaling [60].…”
Section: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Of Sex Steroid Action Imentioning
confidence: 99%