2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo BMP-7 (OP-1) enhancement of osteoporotic vertebral bodies in an ovine model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cumulative rhBMP-2 release was only approximately 38% when GMs had almost completely degraded [10,12] because part of the rhBMP-2 interacted with CPC after delivery from the microspheres and was released very slowly via diffusion [5,24,25]. In our model, the defect did not heal spontaneously after 140 days, which is similar to results reported for an ovine model [23]. Therefore, this bone defect is critical-sized in the osteoporotic model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…cumulative rhBMP-2 release was only approximately 38% when GMs had almost completely degraded [10,12] because part of the rhBMP-2 interacted with CPC after delivery from the microspheres and was released very slowly via diffusion [5,24,25]. In our model, the defect did not heal spontaneously after 140 days, which is similar to results reported for an ovine model [23]. Therefore, this bone defect is critical-sized in the osteoporotic model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Sustained release of BMPs can accelerate bone healing in osteoporosis [3,23]. GMs have been widely used as a controlledrelease carrier of growth factors with good biocompatibility and degradability [12,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bone loss has been reported previously at various skeletal sites in sheep following ovariectomy [5,16,27,28,42], chronic steroid therapy [7,10] or dietary manipulation [9], but in none of these studies, could these animals be classified as osteoporotic by standard definitions. Other studies have implemented combination treatments to induce osteoporosis in sheep [13, 14, 19-21, 29, 32, 33] and although such treatments have resulted in further bone loss compared to the single treatments, lumbar spine BMD was either not reduced significantly [13,29,32,33] or it did not achieve the minimum of 25% bone loss [20,21] required to classify them as osteoporotic. The current study was undertaken in an attempt to achieve more substantial bone loss in the lumbar spine of domestic sheep, a large animal that is frequently used for experimental studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%