2022
DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2058020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo Biomechanical Changes Associated With Keratoconus Progression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In addition, Padmanabhan et al showed a simultaneous deterioration of the SSI and IIR among the disease progression by À0.10 ± 0.06 and +0.95 ± 1.04 mm, respectively. 32 By contrast, the SSI increased by +0.08 in our CXL group showing enhanced biomechanical stiffness, whereas the uFE group did not change in the same period. Furthermore, the mean change of both SSI and IIR differed between the CXL and the uFE group, which underpinned the alterations in stiffness of the CXL group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…6 In addition, Padmanabhan et al showed a simultaneous deterioration of the SSI and IIR among the disease progression by À0.10 ± 0.06 and +0.95 ± 1.04 mm, respectively. 32 By contrast, the SSI increased by +0.08 in our CXL group showing enhanced biomechanical stiffness, whereas the uFE group did not change in the same period. Furthermore, the mean change of both SSI and IIR differed between the CXL and the uFE group, which underpinned the alterations in stiffness of the CXL group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Liu et al reported that the SSI was relatively stable before 35 years of age and was positively correlated with anterior corneal curvature and IOP and negatively correlated with axial length (AL) in a healthy Chinese population ( Liu et al, 2020 ). Thus, SSI could be suitable for the assessment of reduction in corneal stiffness in the natural progression of keratoconus and help recognize potential keratoconic eyes ( Padmanabhan et al, 2022 ; Liu et al, 2021a ). Some studies reported correlations between SSI values and IOP; therefore, SSI values may also be used for the differentiation of glaucoma types ( Ye et al, 2021 ; Silva et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study revealed that the SSI was not significantly different between eyes with mild keratoconus and normal eyes, and the AUROC was 0.642 for detecting keratoconus ( Herber et al, 2022 ), which is similar to that in our study ( Supplementary Tables S1, S2 ), suggesting that the SSI alone was not suitable for screening keratoconus. However, the SSI was proven to decrease significantly during the reduction of corneal stiffness in the progression of keratoconus ( Padmanabhan et al, 2022 ) and increased after corneal cross-linking ( Nishida et al, 2022 ), demonstrating that the SSI may be more suitable for monitoring the progression and treatment efficacy in keratoconus, however, its application in screening keratoconus still needs to be further explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%