2010
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo BDNF modulation of hippocampal mossy fiber plasticity induced by high frequency stimulation

Abstract: Changes in synaptic efficacy and morphology have been proposed as mechanisms underlying learning and memory processes. In our previous studies, high frequency stimulation (HFS) sufficient to induce LTP at the hippocampal mossy fiber (MF) pathway, leads to MF synaptogenesis, in a prominent contralateral form, at the stratum oriens of hippocampal CA3 area. Recently we reported that acute intrahippocampal microinfusion of BDNF induces a lasting potentiation of synaptic efficacy at the MF projection accompanied by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(95 reference statements)
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, a large body of evidence stresses the important role of ACh, DA, intracellular cAMP elevation and BDNF signaling, respectively, in gating, facilitating or even mediating signaling events leading to synaptic plasticity (see e.g., cAMP: Otmakhova et al, 2000; DA/cAMP: Navakkode et al, 2010; Sheynikhovich et al, 2013; Otani et al, 2015; ACh: Nakauchi and Sumikawa, 2012; BDNF: Sivakumaran et al, 2009; Schjetnan and Escobar, 2012; Schildt et al, 2013, compare Figure 2). These same neuromodulators were also reported to be essential for establishing STDP (see e.g., ACh: Couey et al, 2007; Goriounova and Mansvelder, 2012; NA/ACh: Seol et al, 2007; DA: Pawlak and Kerr, 2008; Zhang et al, 2009; Edelmann and Lessmann, 2011, 2013; Cassenaer and Laurent, 2012; Yang and Dani, 2014; endocannabinoids (eCB): Cui et al, 2015, 2016; BDNF: Edelmann et al, 2015; Monoamines: He et al, 2015; compare Figure 1).…”
Section: Input Specific Involvement Of Neuromodulators Allows Coexistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, a large body of evidence stresses the important role of ACh, DA, intracellular cAMP elevation and BDNF signaling, respectively, in gating, facilitating or even mediating signaling events leading to synaptic plasticity (see e.g., cAMP: Otmakhova et al, 2000; DA/cAMP: Navakkode et al, 2010; Sheynikhovich et al, 2013; Otani et al, 2015; ACh: Nakauchi and Sumikawa, 2012; BDNF: Sivakumaran et al, 2009; Schjetnan and Escobar, 2012; Schildt et al, 2013, compare Figure 2). These same neuromodulators were also reported to be essential for establishing STDP (see e.g., ACh: Couey et al, 2007; Goriounova and Mansvelder, 2012; NA/ACh: Seol et al, 2007; DA: Pawlak and Kerr, 2008; Zhang et al, 2009; Edelmann and Lessmann, 2011, 2013; Cassenaer and Laurent, 2012; Yang and Dani, 2014; endocannabinoids (eCB): Cui et al, 2015, 2016; BDNF: Edelmann et al, 2015; Monoamines: He et al, 2015; compare Figure 1).…”
Section: Input Specific Involvement Of Neuromodulators Allows Coexistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part, this move toward exploring the use of non-invasive neuomodulation is fueled by an increasing understanding of the mechanisms that drive abnormal structural and functional organization of the brain in psychiatric and neurologic disease, and an increasing realization that improved characterization of these mechanisms affords greater opportunities for focused intervention. Clinically-oriented discoveries in systems-level neuroscience have led to a sea change in the conceptualization of a variety of disease processes such as depression (Boggio et al, 2008; Brunoni et al, 2011, 2012), dementia syndromes (Freitas et al, 2011; Elder and Taylor, 2014), traumatic brain injury (Demirtas-Tatlidede et al, 2012), and focal deficits after stroke (Schjetnan and Escobar, 2012; Blesneag et al, 2015), not simply as problems with specific regions of the brain, but as problems with brain networks, the treatment of which is directly linked to the ability to harness and modulate the brains' capacity for functional reorganization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behaviors associated with conditioned defeat are enhanced by overexpression of CREB in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) [27]. Neurotrophins such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor tropomyosin related kinase B (TrK B ) as well as the AMPA receptor subunit GluR 1 contribute to molecular mechanisms of neural plasticity such as long-term potentiation, synaptic remodeling, and changes in learning [23,2830]. What is more, BDNF and TrK B in the hippocampus and amygdala appear to be important for social defeat conditioning [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%