Nanomaterials - Toxicity and Risk Assessment 2015
DOI: 10.5772/60707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo Assessment of Nanomaterials Toxicity

Abstract: The concern regarding the safety of nanomaterials for the human body is constantly raising. On one hand, there is an increase in the production of nanomaterials for technological applications, which raises the risk of accidental exposure of the workers during the technological manipulation. On the other hand, nanomaterials can be designed for medical applications and their faith in the human body, along with their interactions with different tissues, becomes of vital importance.The mechanisms involved in nanom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays systems for the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents are very diverse, and each one has its advantages and disadvantages. Most types of the drug delivery systems (liposomes, dendrimers, nanoparticles, polymer conjugates, and so forth) have а synthetic nature and metabolism in the body can produce toxic products that can be invoked by toxic effects during elimination and other complications [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Moreover, a technological point of view design and development of synthetic carriers is a highly costed process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays systems for the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents are very diverse, and each one has its advantages and disadvantages. Most types of the drug delivery systems (liposomes, dendrimers, nanoparticles, polymer conjugates, and so forth) have а synthetic nature and metabolism in the body can produce toxic products that can be invoked by toxic effects during elimination and other complications [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Moreover, a technological point of view design and development of synthetic carriers is a highly costed process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The respiratory system, digestive tract and skin are passed by the atmospheric nanoparticles [64], process that leads to oxidative stress, inflammation, or other pathological effects. The noxious effects of NPs depend on their size, chemical structure, or shape [65]. The skin penetration of atmospheric nanoparticles is realised transcellular (NPs <75 nm), intercellular, through the hair follicles, sweat and sebaceous glands [66].…”
Section: Urban Atmospheric Nanoparticles In the Human Body: Penetratimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the toxicological effects of a carbon nanostructure will most likely differ once combined into a composite, and the fact that many composite materials have been independently tested for safety, we have focused on describing the toxicological effects of common carbon nanostructures below without potential composite materials. Complicating the matter is the fact that studies are difficult to compare due to there being different species, dosing, vehicles, functionalizations, and characterisation techniques; resulting in problematic interpretation and inadequate risk-assessment [ 192 , 204 ].…”
Section: Toxicity Of Carbon Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies suggest that there are two main mechanisms of carbon nanostructure toxicity: inflammation and reactive oxidative species (ROS), which are inter-related [ 192 , 216 ]. Production of ROS results in lipid peroxidation, protein alteration, and intracellular GSH depletion, leading to NF-kB activation which in turn upregulates IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, iNOS (proinflammatory markers) to trigger cell death [ 216 , 217 ].…”
Section: Toxicity Of Carbon Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%