Int erest in molecular imaging of infections and inflammation has dramatically increased as its clinical relevance has become unambiguously strengthened by the need to clearly distinguish one from the other. This need relates both to the impact of overtreatment (e.g., immune suppression in inflammation) and the induction of resistance (i.e., patterns of increasing antibiotic resistance in infections). In recent years, our understanding and knowledge of the similarities and differences in the pathophysiology of infectious and inflammatory diseases has significantly improved. Molecular imaging offers unique and unsurpassed possibilities for better separating inflammatory processes from infection-related processes. Together with the recent developments in hybrid multimodality imaging techniques, accompanied by new radiopharmaceuticals and smart chemistry, nuclear medicine has positioned itself clearly as a key player in the field of infection and inflammation.
See page 681Clinicians often struggle with questions about presumed or established infectious or inflammatory disorders: Is there an infectious focus, or is it an inflammatory sign? What is the extent of the lesion? Are there infectious metastases? Are the therapeutic drugs entering and penetrating the infection site? Is the therapy successful? Can I withdraw the treatment and switch to other therapeutic options, or is continuation needed? We have to provide answers to these questions, supporting the clinician in individualtherapy decision making and preventing over-or undertreatment and its potential effects on the patient and on society, such as the spread of highly antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. However, we are not there yet. There are still questions to be answered and hurdles to be overtaken, but at the end of the tunnel is a clear and bright future for molecular imaging.18 F-FDG PET/CT is the most commonly used diagnostic imaging tool worldwide for infection and inflammation. The accumulation of leukocytes, macrophages, monocytes, lymphocytes, and giant cells constitutes the body's response to injury and infection. Upregulation of glucose transporters has been demonstrated in all these individual cell types and contributes to increased accumulation and detection of 18 F-FDG in infection and inflammation. In 2013, a guideline on the use of 18 F-FDG in infection and inflammation was published jointly by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. On the basis of a cumulated reported accuracy of more than 85% and the opinions of leading international experts, the guideline concluded that the major indications for 18 F-FDG PET/ CT in infection and inflammation were sarcoidosis, peripheral bone osteomyelitis, suspected spinal infection, fever of unknown origin, metastatic infection, bacteremia in high-risk patients, and vasculitis (1). For other indications, not enough evidence-based data were available to draw a conclusion, or it was still unclear whether 18 F-FDG PET/CT offered any signif...