2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo 3-dimensional analysis of scapular kinematics: comparison of dominant and nondominant shoulders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
79
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The scapula alone can move in various ways. Many studies have measured and analyzed shoulder motion with a variety of methods [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] . Scapulohumeral rhythm changes with load or velocity and with the phase of the elevation angle, and thus its value is not constant [8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scapula alone can move in various ways. Many studies have measured and analyzed shoulder motion with a variety of methods [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] . Scapulohumeral rhythm changes with load or velocity and with the phase of the elevation angle, and thus its value is not constant [8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scapulohumeral rhythm changes with load or velocity and with the phase of the elevation angle, and thus its value is not constant [8][9][10] . It is commonly thought that the collapse of scapulohumeral rhythm may predict glenohumeral dysfunction 3,5,11) . Upward rotation, posterior tilt, and internal rotation of the scapula reportedly increase with glenohumeral elevation, and the internal and external rotation angles differ significantly between the planes of elevation during glenohumeral flexion, scapular plane elevation, and abduction 4) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced clavicular elevation and increased protraction found in this study in females is similar to findings in clavicular posture in previous studies Sobush et al, 1996). The reduced scapular upward rotation on the right side reported for the whole population has also been reported in other studies reporting a more downward rotated scapula on the dominant side in rightdominant people (Greenfield et al, (1995); Raine and Twomey (1997), Schwartz et al, (2014), Matsuki et al, (2011). Other studies in contrast reported a more retracted clavicle and upwardly rotated scapula (Morais and Pascoal 2013) (Table 6.4-1).…”
Section: Hand Dominance and Side Differencesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Right-dominant females demonstrated less elevated and retracted clavicle of the non-dominant side (Greenfield et al, 1995;Matsuki et al, 2011;Raine and Twomey 1997;Schwartz et al, 2014). reported a more downward rotated scapula on the dominant side in right-handed people.…”
Section: Hand Dominance and Side Differencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hand dominance also has been reported to affect the minimum clinically important difference in patient-reported VAS for rotator cuff disease [22]. In addition, hand dominance affects scapular and clavicular kinematics in nonthrowing patients and kinematics and kinetics in throwing athletes [12,13,23]. There are limited and conflicting data available in the shoulder arthroplasty literature regarding the effect of hand dominance on outcome after TSA [2,4,16,18,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%