In–vitro–Verschleiß von Aktivierungselementen für Teleskopkronen

Bayer, Stefan; Al–Mansour, R.; Grüner, Manfred; Enkling, Norbert; Stark, Helmut; Mues, Sebastian

doi:10.1055/s-0028-1093315

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Telescopic Crown Disadvantages1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, after a period of use, the retention force between the crowns decreases. This is due to repeated insertion and removal of the prosthesis and the wear of the crown metal [19,24,35,36]. Failure to ensure proper fit of crowns or poor oral hygiene can result in cervical caries [20,21].…”

Section: Telescopic Crown Disadvantagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Telescopic double crowns in prosthodontics

Kara

2021

IJDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this article is to classify the types of telescopic prostheses that protect natural teeth as an alternative to traditional removable prostheses, and to explain their advantages, disadvantages, indications and clinical significance in order to minimize the problems of removable dentures. Telescopic prostheses consist of an inner (primary) crown permanently cemented to an abutment and an outer (secondary) crown attached to the prosthesis. Primary crowns protect the abutment from bruises and thermal irritation, and also provide retention and stabilization of the secondary crown. The secondary crown combines the primary crown with the prosthesis to form a telescopic unit, providing prosthetic retention and stability.

show abstract

Section: Telescopic Crown Disadvantagesmentioning

confidence: 99%