2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro techniques to evaluate buccal films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
191
0
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
191
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…For every time point, the medium was carefully removed to obtain an accurate weight of the sample and replaced with fresh medium. Three replicates were performed for each sample and swelling index (%) was calculated using equation 5 [23].…”
Section: Swelling Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For every time point, the medium was carefully removed to obtain an accurate weight of the sample and replaced with fresh medium. Three replicates were performed for each sample and swelling index (%) was calculated using equation 5 [23].…”
Section: Swelling Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release exponents of MAS loaded formulations of less than 535 0.45 was outside the limits of Korsmeyer-Peppas model and also highlights the 536 limitations of the Korsmeyer-Peppas model in the understanding of drug release 537 mechanisms (Shoaib, Tazeen, Merchant, & Yousuf, 2006). However, the release 538 exponent of 0.48 for wafers without MAS (MAS 0.00 wafers) shows that drug release 539 from these wafers followed a Fickian diffusion transport mechanism (Nair et al, 2013). 540…”
Section: Drug Release Kinetics 444mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness was measured at six different locations. 18 Folding endurance was measured by folding films (4х4 cm²) at same location repeatedly making an angle of 180° till it breaks. For pH determination, film of size of 1х1 cm² was taken and dipped in water (5 mL) for 30 minutes.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%