1997
DOI: 10.1159/000239582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro Susceptibility of <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i>: Comparison of the E Test with the Agar Dilution Test

Abstract: In vitro susceptibility testing was performed on 66 strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Recently obtained clinical isolates from Austria, France, Norway and Switzerland and 17 reference strains from three type culture collections were tested against ampicillin, gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin-sulbactam, meropenem, and first-, second-, third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins. All isolates were susceptible to ampicillin, gentamicin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin-sulbactam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of acquired resistance in France determined from the largest collection of clinical isolates to date remains low, similar to reported results of previous epidemiological studies in other countries (14,15,19,22,25,31). This contrasts with the higher prevalence of resistance reported for food and environmental Listeria species, possibly overstated due to the existence of a larger reservoir of resistance in Listeria innocua than in L. monocytogenes (6).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevalence of acquired resistance in France determined from the largest collection of clinical isolates to date remains low, similar to reported results of previous epidemiological studies in other countries (14,15,19,22,25,31). This contrasts with the higher prevalence of resistance reported for food and environmental Listeria species, possibly overstated due to the existence of a larger reservoir of resistance in Listeria innocua than in L. monocytogenes (6).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, some studies have recently reported an increased rate of resistance to one or several clinically relevant antibiotics in environmental isolates (1,6,7,21,33,37) and less frequently in clinical strains (3,9,26,31). Yet, this probably remains a marginal phenomenon for clinical strains, although only a limited number of studies have focused on the evaluation of antimicrobial resistance in Listeria (14,15,19,22,25,31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, L. monocytogenes is susceptible to a wide range of antibiotics, including penicillins, aminopenicillins, and carbapenems (5,11). Clinicians treating patients suspected of having L. monocytogenes infection normally utilize ampicillin or benzylpenicillin, either alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside (30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penicillin and ampicillin are bactericidal against most strains of L. monocytogenes; however, in the preferred intracellular milieu, these microorganisms become more recalcitrant and on May 9, 2018 by guest http://jcm.asm.org/ even highly effective drugs are rendered bacteriostatic at best (7,9,15). The lack of in vivo bactericidal antilisteric effect becomes important in the treatment of systemic opportunistic infections in patients with compromised adaptive cellular immunity (10,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These antimicrobials can achieve greater than 99.9% bacterial killing with no evidence of bacterial regrowth (3,7,13,14). However, no measurable antilisteric effect of ciprofloxacin in intracellular cell culture experiments (17) cautions against therapeutic intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%