2000
DOI: 10.1159/000007320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro Susceptibility of <i>Candida dubliniensis</i> to Current and New Antifungal Agents

Abstract: Background: Candida dubliniensis is a recently described Candida species closely related to Candida albicans, which has been associated with oral candidiasis in HIV-infected patients. Fluconazole-resistant strains of C. dubliniensis are easily obtained in vitro and this fact could be a complication if this resistance develops during treatment with this drug. Methods: In the present study, the in vitro antifungal susceptibilities of 36 C. dubliniensis clinical isolates and culture strains to current and new ant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
37
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(7 reference statements)
9
37
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The amphotericin B MICs for all C. dubliniensis isolates tested in this study were Ͻ1 g/ml, which is in agreement with those provided in previous reports (13,20,24,27). Although there is considerable concern about fluconazole resistance among clinical isolates of C. dubliniensis recovered from HIVinfected patients previously treated with the drug (16,17,20), we found that a very low percentage of C. dubliniensis isolates were resistant to fluconazole and ketoconazole.…”
Section: Vol 41 2003 Candida Dubliniensis At a University Hospital supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The amphotericin B MICs for all C. dubliniensis isolates tested in this study were Ͻ1 g/ml, which is in agreement with those provided in previous reports (13,20,24,27). Although there is considerable concern about fluconazole resistance among clinical isolates of C. dubliniensis recovered from HIVinfected patients previously treated with the drug (16,17,20), we found that a very low percentage of C. dubliniensis isolates were resistant to fluconazole and ketoconazole.…”
Section: Vol 41 2003 Candida Dubliniensis At a University Hospital supporting
confidence: 92%
“…37 The resistance profile encountered in C. dubliniensis was, as observed in previous works, different to that observed in C. albicans. 38 In this report, the finding of a high number of C. albicans isolates resistant to fluconazole and itraconazole should be highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Antifungal susceptibility data of non C. neoformans strains are scarce in the literature, even if one considers strains isolated from patients (Kordossis et al 1998, Bauters et al 2001, Chen et al 2001, McCurdy & Morrow 2001, Averbuch et al 2002, Garcia-Martos et al 2002, Quindos et al 2004). The amphotericin B results obtained in both methods tested in this study indicated a similar MIC range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, clinical isolates of C. laurentii and C. albidus show variable resistance to the antifungal (Kordossis et al 1998, Bauters et al 2001, Averbuch et al 2002. Quindos et al (2004) in a study in Spain, reported resistance indexes as high as 80%, with MIC values above 128 µg/ml. Barchiesi et al (1994) and Espinel-Ingroff et al (1992) in comparative studies confirmed the correlation of broth macrodilution and microdilution techniques for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%