1994
DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90092-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium and M. intracellulare to folate antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However the infection was found subsided when treated with azithromycin or clarithromycin together with ethambutol [6, 105]. Further, the M. avium isolates have been demonstrated to get inhibited by sufficient concentrations of sulfamethoxazole in serum [106]. Rifabutin prophylaxis may also help in controlling the disseminated infection [93].…”
Section: Mycobacterium Avium: the Zoonotic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the infection was found subsided when treated with azithromycin or clarithromycin together with ethambutol [6, 105]. Further, the M. avium isolates have been demonstrated to get inhibited by sufficient concentrations of sulfamethoxazole in serum [106]. Rifabutin prophylaxis may also help in controlling the disseminated infection [93].…”
Section: Mycobacterium Avium: the Zoonotic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we have investigated the enzyme 6-hydroxymethyl-7,8-dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS, EC 2.5.1.15) from M. tuberculosis in order to explore the possibilities this protein gives for the design of anti-TB drugs. Diaminodiphenylsulfone or dapsone (Figure 1), a sulfone inhibitor of DHPS, has been clinically used for decades to treat leprosy, which is caused by the related organism Mycobacterium leprae (Anand, 1996), and sulfamethoxazole ( Figure 1) has been shown to have in vitro effects against Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare (Raszka et al, 1994). M. tuberculosis DHPS is very similar to M. leprae DHPS (79 % sequence identity) and Mycobacterium avium DHPS (81 % sequence identity) (preliminary sequence data from The Institute for Genomic Research).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the compound in Table 1 with the best combination of potency and selectivity against Pc DHFR was the 5′-(3-carboxyphenyl)ethynyl analogue 28. In terms of the distance separating the COOH group from the phenyl ring, 28 was intuitively viewed as an analogue of 2,4-diamino-5-[2′-methoxy-5′-(4-carboxy-1pentynyl)benzyl]pyrimidine (15), whose IC 50 against Pc and rat DHFR was previously reported to be 28 and 2200 nM, respectively. 3 It thus appears that replacement of the three CH 2 groups in the side chain of this compound with a phenyl ring was favorable for binding to both enzymes but unfortunately was more favorable for binding to the rat enzyme, resulting in lower selectivity.…”
Section: Enzyme Inhibition Assaysmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since 2 μg/mL is generally considered a physiologically achievable concentration, these compounds could have therapeutic utility in the treatment of disseminated M. avium infection. Interestingly, trimethoprim by itself is reported to be ineffective against human isolates of M. avium even at a concentration of up to 1.5 μg/mL, although there is at least one report that it is clinically effective against M. avium infection when combined with sulfamethoxazole . It may be noted that, while their in vitro molar equivalent potency is considerably lower than that of several popular macrolide and quinolone antibiotics, ,, the antifolate activity of 12 , 13 , and 16 would probably not be affected by macrolide resistance, an emergent problem in the clinical management of M. avium infection .…”
Section: Enzyme Inhibition Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation