2012
DOI: 10.1070/qe2012v042n03abeh014674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-vitro study of the temperature dependence of the optoacoustic conversion efficiency in biological tissues

Abstract: The applicability of the optoacoustic (OA) method for monitoring temperature during thermal impact on biological tissues is studied experimentally. Tissues under study were chicken breast (as a model of muscle), porcine lard (as a model of fatty tissue) and porcine liver (as a model of richly perfused tissue). The temperature dependences of the amplitude of the OA signals excited in biologi cal tissues were measured in-vitro in the temperature range of 20 -80 °C under the narrow laser beam conditions. Measurem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 shows mean value and SD of phase transition characteristic temperatures averaged over 10 fat samples studied by each measurement technique [AR, spectral OCT (S-OCT), and AR/time-domain OCT (AR/TD-OCT)] and comparison with the independent measurements done for 10 samples using optoacoustic technique. 65,66 It is worth noting that data presented in Table 4 for all 30 samples studied in this paper demonstrate existence of the very-low-temperature transitions for 29 samples in the range from 22.3°C to 26.5°C detected by all three measurement techniques (AR, S-OCT, and AR/TD-OCT, respectively). The lowtemperature transitions in the range from 30.6°C to 35.2°C were also detected by all techniques for 27 samples, whereas the middle-temperature range transitions between ð39.5 AE 1.9Þ°C and ð44.4 AE 0.6Þ°C were found only for AR measurements, for nine and six samples from studied 10, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 4 shows mean value and SD of phase transition characteristic temperatures averaged over 10 fat samples studied by each measurement technique [AR, spectral OCT (S-OCT), and AR/time-domain OCT (AR/TD-OCT)] and comparison with the independent measurements done for 10 samples using optoacoustic technique. 65,66 It is worth noting that data presented in Table 4 for all 30 samples studied in this paper demonstrate existence of the very-low-temperature transitions for 29 samples in the range from 22.3°C to 26.5°C detected by all three measurement techniques (AR, S-OCT, and AR/TD-OCT, respectively). The lowtemperature transitions in the range from 30.6°C to 35.2°C were also detected by all techniques for 27 samples, whereas the middle-temperature range transitions between ð39.5 AE 1.9Þ°C and ð44.4 AE 0.6Þ°C were found only for AR measurements, for nine and six samples from studied 10, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…9)] agrees well with the results obtained by optoacoustic measurements for ex vivo samples of porcine fat (the right column of Table 4). 65,66 Data received for both techniques have a similar trend and high correlation index (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the OCT and the optoacoustic measurements was 0.958; between the refractometry and the optoacoustic measurements was 0.958). Unfortunately, we could not compare the second high-temperature transition of porcine fat found in optoacoustic measurements at ð65 AE 2Þ°C (Table 4) and (b) the phase transition is defined as a change in the relative slope of the temperature dependence of the RI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The absorbed laser energy is too small to bring about significant temperature changes, so that the temperature of the medium is controlled by that of its immediate surroundings. A representative sample of the relevant literature is conveyed in (Esenaliev et al, 2000;Larin et al, 2005;Nikitin et al, 2012a;Nikitin et al, 2012b;Petrova et al, 2013;Shah et al, 2009;Pramanik & Wang, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these studies, a number of significant differences in instrumentation, laser wavelength, irradiated medium, and acoustic results was encountered. In (Nikitin et al, 2012a;Nikitin et al, 2012b), a 1064-nm laser beam was rotated by 90 o to enable the sound-detecting piezoelectric transducer to be positioned upstream of the irradiated specimen. The specimens, all biological, were positioned in a heated water bath.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation