2019
DOI: 10.37358/mp.19.1.5165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Study of the Structure and Adhesive Interface in Direct Restorations with Commercial Nanocomposite Materials

Abstract: The purpose of this study was: Structural characterization of two commercial nanocomposite materials (Premise ™/Kerr Corp and Tetric EvoCeram�/ Ivoclar-Vivadent); Evaluation of the marginal adaptation and adhesive interface achieved with two commercial adhesive systems (Optibond SoloPlus ™/Kerr Corp and G-Bond ™/GC). Investigation was done using electronic scanning microscopy (SEM).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, glass test tubes were used to obtain A-PRF, although there are studies that preferentially indicate plastic test tubes or test tubes made of glass with the walls lined by plastic, because glass hardness more rapidly promotes coagulation cascades, unlike plastic elasticity that would prolong the coagulation time [43], but there are studies evidencing the detachment of silica microparticles during centrifugation of test tubes containing plastic masses. Although the silica particles of test tubes are considered to be stable, the possibility of inducing cytotoxicity in inflammatory cell responses was found [44], a behavior similar to that of direct dental adhesive systems [45].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, glass test tubes were used to obtain A-PRF, although there are studies that preferentially indicate plastic test tubes or test tubes made of glass with the walls lined by plastic, because glass hardness more rapidly promotes coagulation cascades, unlike plastic elasticity that would prolong the coagulation time [43], but there are studies evidencing the detachment of silica microparticles during centrifugation of test tubes containing plastic masses. Although the silica particles of test tubes are considered to be stable, the possibility of inducing cytotoxicity in inflammatory cell responses was found [44], a behavior similar to that of direct dental adhesive systems [45].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite resins with a higher filler ratio absorb less water [24,29]. The mechanical and chemical properties of composite resins, including water absorption, are influenced by the type and degree of filler, the inorganic silane and the distribution of particles in the organic phase [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. If in the condensation stage, before polymerization, air bubbles are incorporated into the organic matrix, causing the appearance of macro/micropores, water/saliva can be absorbed without changing the volume of the restoration [37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of composites are influenced by type and extent of filler and inorganic silane and correct distribution of nanoparticles in the organic phase. In vitro studies are necessary to evaluate the biocompatibility of all dental materials [29][30][31].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%