2022
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.986377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro study of decellularized rat tissues for nerve regeneration

Abstract: Peripheral nerve injuries cause an absence or destruction of nerves. Decellularized nerves, acting as a replacement for autografts, have been investigated in the promotion of nerve repair and regeneration, always being incorporated with stem cells or growth factors. However, such a strategy is limited by size availability. The potential application in heterotopic transplantation of other decellularized tissues needs to be further explored. In this study, rat decellularized kidney (dK) was selected to be compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DK was chosen in this study to compare with DN due the enrichment of erythropoietin (EPO) that could promote the regeneration in optic nerve [ 24 ] and peripheral nerve [ 25 ], which could explain why DK + GC performed better than GC alone in electrophysiological detection, gastrocnemius proportion measurement, and histological assessments. However, based on our previous study [ 47 ], DK had much lower expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) compared with DN. All these growth factors have critical influence on the promotion of nerve cell migration, proliferation, survival, outgrowth of sensory, sympathetic, and motor nerve regeneration [ 48 50 ], which could have a better promotion effect on nerve regeneration compared with EPO and lead to the better performance of GC + DN compared with GC + DK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DK was chosen in this study to compare with DN due the enrichment of erythropoietin (EPO) that could promote the regeneration in optic nerve [ 24 ] and peripheral nerve [ 25 ], which could explain why DK + GC performed better than GC alone in electrophysiological detection, gastrocnemius proportion measurement, and histological assessments. However, based on our previous study [ 47 ], DK had much lower expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) compared with DN. All these growth factors have critical influence on the promotion of nerve cell migration, proliferation, survival, outgrowth of sensory, sympathetic, and motor nerve regeneration [ 48 50 ], which could have a better promotion effect on nerve regeneration compared with EPO and lead to the better performance of GC + DN compared with GC + DK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%