2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro simulation and quantification of wear within the patellofemoral joint replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Compared to the location of the wear scar reported by Ellison et al, 23 in our study it was located Images showing the mean height change (in mm) on the patella after four million cycles with oxidised zirconium (OxZr, left) and cobalt-chrome (CoCr, right) femoral components in neutral position (ML, mediolateral; DP, distal-proximal). Images showing the mean height change (in mm) on the patella after four million cycles with oxidised zirconium (OxZr, left) and cobalt-chrome (CoCr, right) femoral components in 5° of internal rotation (ML, mediolateral; DP, distal-proximal).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9 Compared to the location of the wear scar reported by Ellison et al, 23 in our study it was located Images showing the mean height change (in mm) on the patella after four million cycles with oxidised zirconium (OxZr, left) and cobalt-chrome (CoCr, right) femoral components in neutral position (ML, mediolateral; DP, distal-proximal). Images showing the mean height change (in mm) on the patella after four million cycles with oxidised zirconium (OxZr, left) and cobalt-chrome (CoCr, right) femoral components in 5° of internal rotation (ML, mediolateral; DP, distal-proximal).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Nevertheless, the wear rates found in this study were minimal compared to standard tibiofemoral wear rates. Moreover, they were significantly lower than the patellofemoral wear rate first quantified by Ellison et al, 23 who showed a mean wear rate of 3.13 mm 3 /Mcycle (SD 1.78). Also, the maximum change in height after four million cycles was 65% lower in our study than the maximum penetration found by Ellison et al 23 This can be explained by the fact that our maximum input load was less than half their maximum input load (55% lower).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AA rotation (1 o maximum) was based on data from Ellison et al [20], Lafortune and Cavanagh [21] and Halloran et al…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volumetric wear rate for each station was taken from the previously reported studies, which reported an average wear rate of 3.1 mm 3 /MC for the patellofemoral joint, 24 16.4 mm 3 /MC for the FB design tibiofemoral joint and 16.9 mm 3 /MC for the RP design of tibiofemoral joint. 25 …”
Section: Calculation Of Biological Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%