The bench mark experiments of Hayflick and Moorhead (1) and Hayflick (2) made it clear that normal human cells in culture displaya limited replicative life span.Careful observation of the deterioration in the replicative ability of the cell population, and the morphological and physiological changes that accompanied the proliferative changes led to the interpretation that this phenomenon was reminiscent of cell aging in si tu and, indeed, was human cell aging in culture (3).lnitially, both the observation and the interpretation were controversial. Many in the scientific community, especially gerontologists, resisted the idea that in the presence of adequate nutrition and an otherwise supportive environment, replication could be limited by intrinsic factors, and that the individual cells would undergo senescence in a controlled environment outside the body. However, this finding has been duplicated in many laboratories throughout the world. Furthermore, this general phenomenon of replicative decline during serial subculture was shown to occur in other cell types, such as smooth muscle cells, keratinocytes, endothelial cells and glial cells (reviewed by Cristofalo et al.,4). Gradually through the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's, the validity of the observation of the limited replicated life span of human cells in culture was accepted, although the relationship of the information thus derived to the mechanisms of organismic aging remained controversial.Among the evidence in support of the relevance of senescence in human cell cultures to aging in si tu, the most cited experiments are those showing a small but statistically significant negative correlation between the replicative life span of human skin fibroblast cultures and the age of the donor (2, 5-8).For most investigators, these studies have been the keystone of the arguments for the relevance of cell culture aging to organismic aging.In a recently published study, we reported the replicative life spans of 124 skin fibroblast cultures, ©1999, Editrice Kurtis ranging in age from fetal to 94 years (9). Eight of the donors were fetal-derived, while the rest were volunteers in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging (BLSA). The donors were certified "healthy" at the time of the biopsy by the criteria used in the BLSA. We found high variability in the replicative potential of different celliines (as others did), but no clear correlation between donor age and fibroblast replicative life span. A similar finding was reported by Goldstein et al. (10) Cristofalo et al. (9) also compared skin fibroblast cell lines from six individuals who provided skin sampies sequentially during their participation in the BLSA, and found no correlation between the age at which the sampie was taken and the replicative life span of the corresponding culture.Unfortunately, these findings, which serve to sharpen our understanding of cell culture senescence, have led some workers to conclude that studies of the aging of cell cultures have no relevance whatsoever to cell aging in the organism. ...