2010
DOI: 10.1002/0471142727.mb2403s88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Selection of RNA Aptamers to a Protein Target by Filter Immobilization

Abstract: This unit describes the selection of aptamers from a pool of single-stranded RNA by binding to a protein target. Aptamers generated from this selection experiment can potentially act as protein function inhibitors, and may find applications as therapeutic or diagnostic reagents. A pool of dsDNA is used to generate an ssRNA pool, which is mixed with the protein target. Bound complexes are separated from unbound reagents by filtration, and the RNA:protein complexes are amplified by a combination of reverse trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the immobilisation of the target was performed at pH 7.4 but the pH was maintained at 4.5 during the SELEX process, no amplification was detected after a first round of selection. Another SELEX strategy without BACE1 biotinylation was then performed, with the complexes of bound ssXNA to the target protein being separated from unbound reagents by filtration . Unfortunately, no amplicon was obtained after the 11th round of selection despite several attempts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the immobilisation of the target was performed at pH 7.4 but the pH was maintained at 4.5 during the SELEX process, no amplification was detected after a first round of selection. Another SELEX strategy without BACE1 biotinylation was then performed, with the complexes of bound ssXNA to the target protein being separated from unbound reagents by filtration . Unfortunately, no amplicon was obtained after the 11th round of selection despite several attempts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite using the same N56 pool and other pools with random nucleotide lengths (N35 and N101) and the same selection conditions as used for Stx2, we could not identify aptamers that bound Stx1. Although reasons for not identifying Stx1-binding aptamers are unclear, it can be assumed that Stx1 may not be a “good” target as evidenced by other studies that not every target is suitable for aptamer selection [ 32 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent CE-based partitioning reduces the number of rounds needed due to increase in separation efficiency and higher sensitivity of LIF detection and without the need for intermittent amplification. This is in comparison to other more traditional techniques such as using membrane filters on their own, magnetic beads or affinity columns that often require more than ten rounds of partitioning, amplification, and strand separation to enrich the library [16,17]. In addition, CE-based studies, can be carried out in free solution removing the need for target immobilization and because of the difference in migration times, negative selection is not required.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original selection of aptamers by NC membrane filters involved immobilizing the protein onto the membrane filter and blocking the remaining sites with BSA to prevent nonspecific binding of DNA sequences to the filter [17]. In our procedure, we chose not to immobilize the protein onto the membrane and instead incubated the DNA library with the target protein in solution to form the complex before applying it directly onto the membrane.…”
Section: Selex Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%