2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro response of macrophage polarization to a keratin biomaterial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Mφ on cl_CM interestingly tended to polarize toward the M1phenotype and showed higher mRNA levels of IL-1 and IL-6 and CD86 cytokine expression, while an unclear polarization profile was observed in ncl_CM. This is consistent with previous reports that Mφ cultured on the collagen coating surface-expressed mostly M1 surface markers (CD86) but also some M2 markers and produced high levels of proinflammatory cytokines(Fearing & Van Dyke, 2014). Furthermore, cross-linking of collagen is associated with Mφ polarization profiles, as indicated by the residual chemical cross-links in the material(Delgado, Bayon, Pandit, & Zeugolis, 2015).…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, Mφ on cl_CM interestingly tended to polarize toward the M1phenotype and showed higher mRNA levels of IL-1 and IL-6 and CD86 cytokine expression, while an unclear polarization profile was observed in ncl_CM. This is consistent with previous reports that Mφ cultured on the collagen coating surface-expressed mostly M1 surface markers (CD86) but also some M2 markers and produced high levels of proinflammatory cytokines(Fearing & Van Dyke, 2014). Furthermore, cross-linking of collagen is associated with Mφ polarization profiles, as indicated by the residual chemical cross-links in the material(Delgado, Bayon, Pandit, & Zeugolis, 2015).…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Other groups have shown that macrophages exposed to keratin proteins produced by crude extraction processes, preferentially differentiate to the M2 anti-inflammatory and reparative phenotype. 41 Though it is tempting to make the argument that the increases of macrophages in ciprofloxacin-loaded keratose hydrogels are due to an increase in M2 macrophages based on this study, there were no increases in macrophages seen in the keratose only-treated wounds. This suggests that the macrophage increase in the ciprofloxacin-loaded keratose hydrogels is unrelated to the keratin used in this study, and it is likely due to the presence of ciprofloxacin in these wounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The two distinct states of Mφs elicit divergent effects: the M1 phenotype cells upregulate activities related to tissue destruction via secretion of numerous proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interleukin-6 (IL-6); whereas cells with an M2 subtype support tissue remodeling by releasing large amounts of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) [18, 19]. Therefore, Mφs can promote both positive and negative outcomes depending on context-dependent polarization profiles, and transition from an M1 phenotype to an M2 phenotype is a key strategy to control and promote tissue regeneration [20, 21]. Although concerted efforts have been placed into using biomaterials to coax Mφ polarization, investigations into interactions between MSCs and Mφs also substantiate the fact that functional MSCs can drive protective M2 polarization [2227].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%