2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02669-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro prediction of organ toxicity: the challenges of scaling and secondary mechanisms of toxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substances used, their concentration and incubation time are presented in Table 1 (Tab. 1) (References in Table 1: Hengstler et al, 2020[ 21 ]; Aduen et al, 1994[ 1 ]; Nelson et al, 2011[ 34 ]; Divakaruni et al, 2014[ 14 ]; Cooper et al, 1989[ 9 ]; Davies and Anderson, 1997[ 12 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substances used, their concentration and incubation time are presented in Table 1 (Tab. 1) (References in Table 1: Hengstler et al, 2020[ 21 ]; Aduen et al, 1994[ 1 ]; Nelson et al, 2011[ 34 ]; Divakaruni et al, 2014[ 14 ]; Cooper et al, 1989[ 9 ]; Davies and Anderson, 1997[ 12 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies face a similar challenge, which is the choice of concentrations for in vitro testing (Leist et al, 2017[ 10 ]). This question has recently been discussed in an editorial of the Archives of Toxicology, where the authors pointed out that in vitro tests are usually performed at a concentration range around and above the plasma peak concentrations (C max ) of a drug in humans (Hengstler et al, 2020[ 8 ]). A typical strategy is to test relatively high concentrations, often 20- or even 200-fold higher than the human plasma C max .…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…compounds, whose toxicity depends on specific metabolic pathways may require higher scaling factors than compounds that do not require bio-activation. Moreover, scaling may also depend on the mechanism of toxicity (Hengstler et al, 2020[ 8 ]). To gain more insight into the requirements of optimal scaling it is not helpful to test only one or two concentrations, e.g.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of non-monotonic responses by EDCs (in which their effects change, in an inverted U or U-shape) also makes the work of researchers very difficult, since it is necessary to be aware that a high dose of EDC is not always it is the most toxic, but it can be a lower dose-this event makes difficult to define the safe dose of a given compound (Diamanti-Kandarakis et al, 2009;Vandenberg et al, 2012;Couderq et al, 2020). Indeed, one of the greatest challenges in toxicology is the choice of concentrations for in vitro testing, an issue that has been discussed recently (Leist et al, 2017;Albrecht, 2020;Hengstler et al, 2020). Currently, the use of relatively high concentrations (20 to 200 times higher than in vivo blood concentrations (C max ) is agreed upon, as these high concentrations lead to better accuracy results than lower concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, higher concentrations in the culture medium are required to observe cell damage compared to the C max that is known to cause adverse effects in vivo (in vitro-in vivo scaling factor). Thus, it is advised to use a concentration range close to and above the maximum concentrations observed in human plasma (Hengstler et al, 2020). Furthermore, most EDCs remain understudied, which constituted a major force of investigation but, highlight the need for more emergent investigations to discover the toxicological effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%