2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-007-9354-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro Interactions Between the Oral Absorption Promoter, Sodium Caprate (C10) and S. typhimurium in Rat Intestinal Ileal Mucosae

Abstract: C(10) does not promote the permeation of a common bacterium across isolated intestinal tissue upon acute co-exposure. It prevents S. typhimurium attachment to epithelia and impedes growth of a range of different bacterial strains.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Capric acid and C 10 have established antibacterial-and antiviral properties at similar concentrations to those required for absorption-promotion [207][208][209]. We found that C 10 does not increase the translocation of E. coli across Caco-2 monolayers, while the detergent, Triton X-100, significantly increased E. coli flux at concentrations that modulate permeability (Fig.…”
Section: [23] Preclinical Safety Data For C 10mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Capric acid and C 10 have established antibacterial-and antiviral properties at similar concentrations to those required for absorption-promotion [207][208][209]. We found that C 10 does not increase the translocation of E. coli across Caco-2 monolayers, while the detergent, Triton X-100, significantly increased E. coli flux at concentrations that modulate permeability (Fig.…”
Section: [23] Preclinical Safety Data For C 10mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…perfringens and S. sonnei [207,208]. Capric acid also has antimicrobial activity against a panel of bacteria that are frequently found in clinical microbiology [211].…”
Section: [23] Preclinical Safety Data For C 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerns over colonic co-absorption of bystander pathogens, including bacteria, bacterial toxins and viruses in the presence of PEs have thus far not been vindicated, but studies have been largely restricted to in vitro models (34). Of interest is that similar C 10 concentrations required for PE in vivo inhibited adhesion of Salmonella typhimurium in isolated rat intestinal mucosae and indeed were bactericidal against S. typhimurium and several gram-positive and -negative bacteria (35). Overall, it would be preferable for MCFAs to have no effect on the intestinal microbiota, either toxic, innocuous or probiotic species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. typhimurium was not able to translocate across isolated rat ileal mucosa upon co-exposure to C 10 (1-30mM). 61 The lack of facilitation by C 10 may in part be due to known anti-bacterial effects of MCFA, which may pose questions on its possible unbalancing effects on gut microbiota, although this would be unlikely to occur due to the rapid absorption of MCFAs in the gut. In relation to other oral peptide technologies based on nanotechnology, when LPS was administered to mice orally for 7 consecutive days with or without co-administration of a chitosan-based insulin-entrapped nanoparticle (Fig 4), there was no increase in LPS serum levels nor damage to hepatic tissue.…”
Section: Pe-induced Intestinal Permeability Of Lps and Xenobioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%