2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro inactivation of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella spp. using slightly acidic electrolyzed water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Reductions resulting from SAEW treatment were always more than 1 log CFU/mL and significantly (p<0.05) differed from the control (no treatment), regardless of the treatment time, in agreement with previous reports that SAEW is an effective method for food decontamination (7,8,19,24), but different from previous studies suggesting that 3 min was the best treatment time for SAEW treatments (18,19,25,26). In this study, 1 min was used as the treatment time since 3 and 5 min treatment times resulted in similar degrees of microbial reduction, perhaps due to higher amounts of organic materials (protein/lipid) in kashk, compared with all the foods treated using SAEW in previous reports (1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. Reductions resulting from SAEW treatment were always more than 1 log CFU/mL and significantly (p<0.05) differed from the control (no treatment), regardless of the treatment time, in agreement with previous reports that SAEW is an effective method for food decontamination (7,8,19,24), but different from previous studies suggesting that 3 min was the best treatment time for SAEW treatments (18,19,25,26). In this study, 1 min was used as the treatment time since 3 and 5 min treatment times resulted in similar degrees of microbial reduction, perhaps due to higher amounts of organic materials (protein/lipid) in kashk, compared with all the foods treated using SAEW in previous reports (1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…SAEW is generated based on electrolysis of a dilute hydrochloric acid (HCl) and/or NaCl solution in an electrolytic chamber without a membrane (7). Antimicrobial activity and a low available chlorine content make SAEW an important agent for food sanitization that reduces corrosion of surfaces and damage to human health (8,9). Therefore, during the last decade there has been growing interest in new applications of SAEW in the food industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a near neutral pH, SAEW application seems promising as it minimizes human health and safety issues from Cl 2 off-gassing, reduces corrosion of surfaces and limits phototoxic side effects (Guentzel et al, 2008). SAEW has been proved as an effective antimicrobial agent for inactivating E.coli, S.aureus and Salmonella spp in vitro (Issa-Zacharia et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of new technologies for the generation of chlorinated water, such as electrolysis, can make this process more practical, simple and environmentally appropriate (Rahman et al, 2016). Due to its minimal corrosive potential, SAEW may be less aggressive to human health and the environment, requiring minimum safety processes to manipulate it (Zacharia et al, 2010). The operational costs associated with the application of SAEW can also be lesser because of the possibility of local production (Al-Haq et al, 2005).…”
Section: Electrolyzed Watermentioning
confidence: 99%