2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-017-2258-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro-In Vivo Relationship of Amorphous Insoluble API (Progesterone) in PLGA Microspheres

Abstract: The burst release phase was caused by diffusion of amorphous PRG near the surface, while the second release stage was impacted by PRG-dissolution from crystal depots formed in microspheres. The IVIVC assessment suggests that the in vitro test method used in this study could predict the real situation in vivo and is helpful to study the release mechanism in vivo.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases of cyclosporine A and norquetiapine, their EE values were 57.5 ± 3.0% and 48.3 ± 3.0%, respectively [26,27]. There are also a couple of studies encapsulating progesterone into PLGA microspheres via methylene chloride-based solvent evaporation methods [28,29]. Its EE values ranged from 78.2 to 84.6%.…”
Section: Characterization Of Plga Microspheres Prepared Using Ethyl Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of cyclosporine A and norquetiapine, their EE values were 57.5 ± 3.0% and 48.3 ± 3.0%, respectively [26,27]. There are also a couple of studies encapsulating progesterone into PLGA microspheres via methylene chloride-based solvent evaporation methods [28,29]. Its EE values ranged from 78.2 to 84.6%.…”
Section: Characterization Of Plga Microspheres Prepared Using Ethyl Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C max of the implant occurred at approximately 12th day, and the mean plasma concentration–time profile of the microsphere (F 1-5) showed two peaks, among which the first little peak at the 12th day and the second peak at the 42nd day were mainly caused by GOS dispersed in the PLGA depot in a multihydrogel core, respectively (Figure ). The two peak plasma concentration profiles enabled the microspheres prepared by F 1-5 and F 1-10 to achieve AUC 0– t that is 9.36-fold and 7.52-fold greater than that of the Zoladex implant . The increased relative bioavailability could be ascribed to the higher plasma concentration peak by Poloxamer hydrogel depot .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The obtained data were analyzed using a noncompartmental method with Drug and Statistics (DAS) software (version 2.0, Mathematical Pharmacology Professional Committee of China, Shanghai, China). The area under a curve (AUC) was calculated according to the trapezoidal rule, and the absorption fraction ( f ) was acquired by eq . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Cai et al 16 found that when drug loading is as high as 20%, the FITC-dextran distributed as much bigger drug strands, some of which crystallize. Pu et al 12 discovered that progesterone in PLGA microspheres was in an amorphous form. However, the diffraction peak of progesterone began to emerge after 12 hours and the peak intensity gradually increased during the continuous release process.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] The properties and interactions of the drug, PLGA, and solvent, usually collectively dictate the impact of formulation composition on microstructure. 12,13 Besides the formulation, the crucial manufacturing processes, such as emulsification, solidification, and drying, can generate LAI microspheres with distinct release performance. 14,15 The significant impact of microstructure on LAI microsphere product release behavior has been emphasized in numerous studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%