2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13213-011-0290-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro growth inhibition of Curvularia gudauskasii by Bacillus subtilis

Abstract: Five rhizosphere Bacillus subtilis isolates were tested for in vitro antagonism against a sugarcane seedling pathogen strain of Curvularia gudauskasii. The isolate B. subtilis SR/B-16 was selected because it permanently inhibits 71% of fungal growth. Microscopic analysis of the antagonistic bacteria effects on C. gudauskasii revealed swelling and bulbous hyphae, vacuolated cytoplasm and no spore formation. The analysis of culture filtrates of SR/B-16 collected from stationary phase showed that they are respons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacillus-secreted lipopeptides, such as iturins and fengycins, strongly antagonize a broad spectrum of plant pathogenic fungi, but rarely inhibit bacteria (Cawoy et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2019). These Bacillus-secreted antifungal lipopeptides cause hyphal deformity, fracture, condensation of protoplasm, and inhibition of spore germination of plant pathogenic fungi (Ratón et al, 2012). However, the differences between these two lipopeptides in terms of their inhibitory mechanisms against pathogenic fungi and their effect on soil microbial diversity remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacillus-secreted lipopeptides, such as iturins and fengycins, strongly antagonize a broad spectrum of plant pathogenic fungi, but rarely inhibit bacteria (Cawoy et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2019). These Bacillus-secreted antifungal lipopeptides cause hyphal deformity, fracture, condensation of protoplasm, and inhibition of spore germination of plant pathogenic fungi (Ratón et al, 2012). However, the differences between these two lipopeptides in terms of their inhibitory mechanisms against pathogenic fungi and their effect on soil microbial diversity remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%