2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0620-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro fertilization does not increase the incidence of de novo copy number alterations in fetal and placental lineages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One persistent concern with all studies of preimplantation embryos is the possibility that IVF culture conditions impact chromosome stability. Indeed, such impacts have been documented by comparing in vitro versus in vivo matured bovine embryos (Tšuiko et al 2017), although no such differences have been detected in humans during preimplantation development (Munné et al 2020) or at live birth (Zamani Esteki et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One persistent concern with all studies of preimplantation embryos is the possibility that IVF culture conditions impact chromosome stability. Indeed, such impacts have been documented by comparing in vitro versus in vivo matured bovine embryos (Tšuiko et al 2017), although no such differences have been detected in humans during preimplantation development (Munné et al 2020) or at live birth (Zamani Esteki et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These multiple de novo CNVs were associated with replication‐based mechanisms, evidenced by short microhomologies and microhomeologies near breakpoints, and mosaicism was not observed (Liu et al, 2017). Another case of an SGA infant was reported with a placenta carrying 3 “partial trisomies”: a 22 Mb dup(6)(p22.3pter), a 5.8 Mb dup(9)(q34.13), and a 22 Mb dup(21)(q21.2qter), present in only one of five placenta biopsies (Zamani Esteki et al, 2019). The alterations were all terminal, in contrast to the smaller interstitial duplications we identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no difference in aneuploidy levels between human IVF embryos and in vivo-derived embryos, obtained via uterine lavage (Munné et al 2019). Similarly, no significant difference between IVF and natural conception was observed at live birth (Zamani Esteki et al 2019b). Although the latter study identified sporadic de novo genomic aberrations in 10% of pregnancies, they were scattered across the genome, representing random events of postzygotic aneuploidy that had no functional consequences on placental biology or fetal health.…”
Section: Consequence Of Chromosomal Mosaicism On Embryo Developmentmentioning
confidence: 77%