2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.02.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro evaluation of prebiotic activity, pathogen inhibition and enzymatic metabolism of intestinal bacteria in the presence of fructans extracted from agave: A comparison based on polymerization degree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…was the most suitable carbon source showing higher bacterial growth compared with CPPF (DPn=2-17) and Orafti ® HP (DPav≥23), while the bacteria in the medium containing Orafti ® HP did not increase comparing to the basal medium (p>0.05) (Table 3). It was shown that the bacterial growth increased with decreasing of the DP, similar with previous reports (Caleffi et al, 2015;Garcí a Gamboa et al, 2018;Lopes et al, 2017;Li et al, 2015;Moreno-Vilet, 2014). In addition, the medium containing CPPF presented lower pH after 24 h incubation in anaerobic chamber compared to the basal medium, except Hjg8 (Table 4), which was consistent with the Δ600 in Table 4.…”
Section: Prebiotic Effectsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…was the most suitable carbon source showing higher bacterial growth compared with CPPF (DPn=2-17) and Orafti ® HP (DPav≥23), while the bacteria in the medium containing Orafti ® HP did not increase comparing to the basal medium (p>0.05) (Table 3). It was shown that the bacterial growth increased with decreasing of the DP, similar with previous reports (Caleffi et al, 2015;Garcí a Gamboa et al, 2018;Lopes et al, 2017;Li et al, 2015;Moreno-Vilet, 2014). In addition, the medium containing CPPF presented lower pH after 24 h incubation in anaerobic chamber compared to the basal medium, except Hjg8 (Table 4), which was consistent with the Δ600 in Table 4.…”
Section: Prebiotic Effectsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, it has been reported that fructans with different DP differ in their prebiotic effectiveness and techno-functional properties, as well as in the removal of low-molecular weight sugars such as glucose, fructose and sucrose, increasing the purity and functionality of fructans. For example, the fraction of agave fructans with DP ˃10 improves the biological effect of triglyceride reduction in relation to native fructans, while the enriched fraction of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) enhances the decrease in body weight, body fat, hyperglycemia and hepatic steatosis [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. For these reasons, the membrane process has been proposed to obtain agave fructans with a higher purity [ 14 , 15 , 16 ] and to obtain different DP fractions [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five types of fructans have been identified in nature so far, which are classified into inulins, neo-inulins, levans, neo-levans and mixed fructans, depending on the type of bond [3,4]. Agave fructans are characterized by the presence of fructose units with a terminal glucose connected by bonds β (2-1) and β (2)(3)(4)(5)(6) and can present different degrees of polymerization, which are determined by the species [5][6][7] as well as the environmental conditions in which the agave is produced, stored and processed [8,9]. Toriz et al (2007) [10] propose a chemical structure for the fructans of Agave tequilana Weber var.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%