2023
DOI: 10.3390/jfb14030130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Vitro Evaluation of Photofunctionalized Implant Surfaces in a High-Glucose Microenvironment Simulating Diabetics

Abstract: The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of photofunctionalization on commercially available dental implant surfaces in a high-glucose environment. Discs of three commercially available implant surfaces were selected with various nano- and microstructural alterations (Group 1—laser-etched implant surface, Group 2—titanium–zirconium alloy surface, Group 3—air-abraded, large grit, acid-etched surface). They were subjected to photo-functionalization through UV irradiation for 60 and 90 min. X-ray photoelect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 15 To improve host cell attachment and osseointegration, procedures such as sand-blasting, acid-etching, anodization, laser treatment, UV-photofunctionalization, and plasma treatment were explored, which cause implant surface modification at the micro- and nanoscale. 16 , 17 These techniques have proven to be effective in the initial osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and increased expression of ontogenesis-related genes, thereby improving the early osseointegration process. 18 , 19 , 20 There is a race between bacteria and host cells for the attachment on the implant surface, and the antibacterial property of implant surfaces can certainly enhance early osseointegration, thus, ensuring the long-term survival of the implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 To improve host cell attachment and osseointegration, procedures such as sand-blasting, acid-etching, anodization, laser treatment, UV-photofunctionalization, and plasma treatment were explored, which cause implant surface modification at the micro- and nanoscale. 16 , 17 These techniques have proven to be effective in the initial osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and increased expression of ontogenesis-related genes, thereby improving the early osseointegration process. 18 , 19 , 20 There is a race between bacteria and host cells for the attachment on the implant surface, and the antibacterial property of implant surfaces can certainly enhance early osseointegration, thus, ensuring the long-term survival of the implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…methods and employing biomolecules viz., graing ECM components, RGD peptide, bactericidal peptides, and antimicrobials, etc., have been reported. [13][14][15] Several challenges exist for current surface modication technologies; mature commercial technologies sometimes offer only limited functionalities, whereas newly developed technologies impart ner surface properties. The latter is difficult to commercialize due to the higher cost and low stability of the obtained surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%