2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro evaluation of celluloytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens AMS1 isolated from traditional fermented soybean (Churpi) as an animal probiotic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(37 reference statements)
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacillus circulan strains have a similar behavior of control as shown from results and spoilage all samples after 48 h of incubation periods. The same finding by Denkova et al concluded that E. coli and Salmonella were sensitive to the presence of probiotic bacteria and during joint cultivation complete inhibition up to the 60 th to the 72 nd h of incubation [23]. On the other contrasting, Staphylococcus aureus showed more resistant to the presence of probiotic bacteria in the medium, but this pathogen was sensitive to Bif.…”
Section: Hemolytic Activitysupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bacillus circulan strains have a similar behavior of control as shown from results and spoilage all samples after 48 h of incubation periods. The same finding by Denkova et al concluded that E. coli and Salmonella were sensitive to the presence of probiotic bacteria and during joint cultivation complete inhibition up to the 60 th to the 72 nd h of incubation [23]. On the other contrasting, Staphylococcus aureus showed more resistant to the presence of probiotic bacteria in the medium, but this pathogen was sensitive to Bif.…”
Section: Hemolytic Activitysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…9 mL of RSM was inoculated with 1 mL overnight culture of probiotic bacteria and 0.1 mL of pathogenic. Inoculated RSM medium was mixed well and incubated at 37°C for 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 h. Following incubation, the population of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria was counted on nutrient agar [23].…”
Section: Effect Of Co-culturing Probiotic Bacteria With Pathogenicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful selection of antimicrobial producers from honey has been reported by several different authors [13]. For example, Manhar et al [50] reported that B. amyloliquefaciens AMS1 inhibited the growth of L. monocytogenes and K. pneumoniae, but did not affect the growth of B. cereus, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Salmonella entericatyphimurium. In contrast with our study, the B. amyloliquefaciens strain HTI-19 exhibited a wider antimicrobial spectrum against pathogens, as it can inhibit the growth of S. thyphimurium and B. cereus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…being known as toxin producers, some of the Bacillus strains are already considered to be safe probiotic bacteria. These include B. endophyticus, B. subtilis, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. pumilus, and B. licheniformis [8,43,50]. Bacillus subtilis has also been shown to have a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activities over diverse pathogenic fungal and bacteria [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B. amyloliquefaciens strain was also isolated from salt spring in Ovca located in Republic of Serbia, indicating the osmotolerant character of the strain which would explain its adaptation on dry medium such as this of dates (Loncar et al, 2014). Manhar et al (2015) isolated B. amyloliquefaciens from traditional fermented soybean (Churpi) and observed the high ability of this strain to degrade cellulose. It is well known that Bacillus species have emerged as a robust organism that can grow in extreme environmental conditions and grow easily to very high densities (Kumar et al 2013).…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%