1996
DOI: 10.3109/01485019608988505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Effect of Escherichia Coli on Human Sperm Acrosome Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacteria including Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis have been demonstrated to have a negative effect on ionophore-induced acrosomal reaction of human spermatozoa in vitro [26, 27]. El-Mulla et al also studied the effect of E. coli on acrosomal reaction of spermatozoa [28]. It was shown that the inducibility of the acrosome reaction was significantly lower in semen samples pretreated with E. coli than in the control samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacteria including Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis have been demonstrated to have a negative effect on ionophore-induced acrosomal reaction of human spermatozoa in vitro [26, 27]. El-Mulla et al also studied the effect of E. coli on acrosomal reaction of spermatozoa [28]. It was shown that the inducibility of the acrosome reaction was significantly lower in semen samples pretreated with E. coli than in the control samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change in acrosomal cap is mainly due to sperm aging or injury (Saacke and Marshall 1968). Presence of micro‐organisms, especially the bacteria in the ejaculates can affect fertilization directly (Morrell 2006) by inducing acrosome reaction (El‐Mulla et al. 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Hasan et al (2001) reported higher sperm acrosomal integrity in semen cryopreserved in extenders having antibiotics compared to that without antibiotics. Bacteria if present in the semen can adhere to the spermatozoa and induce premature acrosome reaction (El-Mulla et al 1996), therefore, this difference may be attributed to reproductive health/hygienic conditions of bulls or difference of technique. The present study evaluated live sperm with intact acrosome, while, the previous studies (Hasan et al 2001;Akhter et al 2008) reported normal apical ridge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, storage media is supportive for microbial growth. Fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa can be directly affected by bacteria (Morrell 2006) that can impair the sperm motility (Panangala et al 1981), have the ability to adhere with spermatozoa (Diemer et al 1996), and can induce the acrosome reaction (El-Mulla et al 1996). During improper handling and processing of semen, as the bacteria proliferate, they release various metabolites that can change the seminal characteristics, such as pH, metabolic products, or free radicals (Das et al 1994;Dhami & Sahni 1994;Althouse et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%