2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2011.01439.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-vitro dissolution methods for controlled release parenterals and their applicability to drug-eluting stent testing

Abstract: In spite of the large quantity of highly potent controlled release parenteral products marketed today, there is still a lack of suitable methods for in vitro dissolution testing for these dosage forms especially with regard to biorelevant testing conditions. For dosage forms implanted into tissues it seems of major importance to reproduce the transport forces which are predominant in vivo (diffusive versus convective) in the in-vitro experimental setup.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to further illustrate the mechanism of drug release of Ac-Dex particles, we fitted the CUR release data to several commonly utilized drug release models, including: (1) a first order model and (2) Hixson–Crowell model for drug dissolution-controlled release, (3) Higuchi model modified to fit burst release at time 0, (4) Korsmeyer–Peppas model and (5) Baker–Lonsdale for drug diffusion-controlled release, (6) Hopfenberg model for surface erosion-controlled release, (7) Baker’s model for both degradation and diffusion-controlled release, and (8) Weibull model as a general empirical equation to describe a dissolution or release process (Bohrey et al, 2016; Costa and Sousa Lobo, 2001; Kamaly et al, 2016; Seidlitz and Weitschies, 2012; Shuwisitkul, 2011). The coefficient of determinations (R 2 ) of the fit for the models are summarized in Table S3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further illustrate the mechanism of drug release of Ac-Dex particles, we fitted the CUR release data to several commonly utilized drug release models, including: (1) a first order model and (2) Hixson–Crowell model for drug dissolution-controlled release, (3) Higuchi model modified to fit burst release at time 0, (4) Korsmeyer–Peppas model and (5) Baker–Lonsdale for drug diffusion-controlled release, (6) Hopfenberg model for surface erosion-controlled release, (7) Baker’s model for both degradation and diffusion-controlled release, and (8) Weibull model as a general empirical equation to describe a dissolution or release process (Bohrey et al, 2016; Costa and Sousa Lobo, 2001; Kamaly et al, 2016; Seidlitz and Weitschies, 2012; Shuwisitkul, 2011). The coefficient of determinations (R 2 ) of the fit for the models are summarized in Table S3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in‐vitro release of ML was studied using the dialysis method [28–30]. Dialysis bags with molecular weight cut‐off of 50 kD were referred to retain the thermosensitive hydrogels, both with and without GP, allowing the release of ML to permeate into the release medium (PBS, pH 7.4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method needs to reflect the transport forces that are predominant in vivo (23). This has been demonstrated in methods using a blood vessel-simulating flow-through cell apparatus (24).…”
Section: Drug-eluting Stentsmentioning
confidence: 99%