2015
DOI: 10.1159/000437214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods

Abstract: Background: The paradigm shift towards the nonsurgical management of dental caries relies on the early detection of the disease. Detection of caries at an early stage is of unequivocal importance for early preventive intervention. Objective: The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the performance of a visual examination using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria, two quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) systems - Inspektor™ Pro and QLF-D Biluminator™ 2 (Inspe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(72 reference statements)
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3,8,14 Nevertheless, the use of QLF for detecting occlusal carious lesions has not presented promising results in permanent teeth. 12,13 With regard to the utilization of QLF for detecting initial lesions in primary teeth in our study, lower or similar sensitivity and accuracy values than those obtained with visual inspection were obtained with the different fluorescence parameters evaluated. Concerning specificity and Az, the values were similar among all methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,8,14 Nevertheless, the use of QLF for detecting occlusal carious lesions has not presented promising results in permanent teeth. 12,13 With regard to the utilization of QLF for detecting initial lesions in primary teeth in our study, lower or similar sensitivity and accuracy values than those obtained with visual inspection were obtained with the different fluorescence parameters evaluated. Concerning specificity and Az, the values were similar among all methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These findings observed for initial and dentin caries lesions corroborate the poor performance obtained with QLF for occlusal carious lesions in permanent teeth, as pointed out in previous studies. 12,13 LFpen yielded similar results to those of visual inspection for initial lesions, but lower specificity for dentin caries lesions. We also observed great differences compared to the values obtained with red fluorescence in QLF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was also the case for conceptual papers and other reviews (not primary studies). Neuhaus et al [2011] 0.73 (0.21, 1.25) Jallad et al [2015] 0.88 (0.80, 0.96) Ekstrand et al [2011] 0.96 (0.83, 1.09) Diniz et al [2011] 0.89 (0.86, 0.92) Souza et al [2013] 0.92 (0.72, 1.12) Gomez et al [2013] 0.85 (0.56, 1.14) Cotta et al [2015] Ekstrand et al [2011] 0.91 (0.78, 1.04) Castilho et al [2016] 0.60 (0.24, 0.96) Ozkan et al [2015] 0.76 (0.38, 1.14) Ko et al [2015] 0.96 (0.94, 0.96) Ekstrand et al [2007] 0. 85 (0.65 Forest plots for meta-analysis and heterogeneity analysis of intra-and inter-examiner reproducibility when ICDAS was used for assessing caries lesion severity.…”
Section: Systematic Review: the Accuracy Of The Icdas In Detectingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,26 Jallad et al reported equal sensitivity and specificity, while comparing ICDAS II with other detection methods. 29 Interestingly Jablonski et al 2012 reported 100% sensitivity and specificity at D1 threshold. 21 The result of this study shows that there was no significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity values as well as the LH+ and LH-values in ICDAS II system under magnification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%