There have been many recent advances in the methods available for restoring root‐filled teeth that can equally be applied to re‐treatment cases. Most of these advances are related to adhesive techniques, composite resin materials, non‐metallic posts, and indirect ceramic materials. These new techniques and materials have enhanced the options available when restoring root‐filled teeth. However, the preservation of sound tooth structure is clearly the most significant factor influencing the survival of teeth following root canal re‐treatment. Although contemporary adhesive techniques will facilitate the preservation of valuable dentin in the re‐treated tooth, the degree of remaining sound tooth structure will ultimately be dictated by the extent of the existing restoration, carious and non‐carious tooth tissue loss, and iatrogenic tooth tissue loss caused during the previous endodontic and restorative procedures. There is a paucity of evidence in relation to the influence of specific restorative procedures on the outcome of root canal re‐treatment. In view of this, the following clinical trials are needed: a comparison of the survival of teeth following primary root canal treatment and re‐treatment; a comparison of the survival of root canal re‐treated teeth restored with different techniques (for example, fiber vs. metal posts); and a comparison of the survival of root canal re‐treated teeth with varying degrees of tooth structure loss.