2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-011-2687-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro comparison of four treatments which discourage infestation by head lice

Abstract: Products which discourage the transmission of head lice are appealing; however, few studies have tested this concept. This study aims to test the efficacy of four commercial products which claim to discourage infestation by head lice; MOOV Head Lice Defence Spray (MOOV), Wild Child Quit Nits Head Lice Defence Spray (Wild Child), 100% Natural Head Lice Beater (Lice Beater) or Lysout Natural Anti-Lice Spray (Lysout). An in vitro challenge test was used. Briefly, one half of a filter paper lining the base of a pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Egypt, head lice infestation is an important public health problem and about 22% of school students in a study carried out in Cairo was lice-infested [ 2 ]. The global control of pediculosis has been hampered as a result of incorrect use of topical insecticides, and the increasing resistance to the commonly used pediculicides, including lindane, malathion, and permethrin [ 3 ]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of new effective pediculicidal products for the market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Egypt, head lice infestation is an important public health problem and about 22% of school students in a study carried out in Cairo was lice-infested [ 2 ]. The global control of pediculosis has been hampered as a result of incorrect use of topical insecticides, and the increasing resistance to the commonly used pediculicides, including lindane, malathion, and permethrin [ 3 ]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of new effective pediculicidal products for the market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head lice are common among children aged 3–11 years, which can be transmitted through either direct (head-to-head) contact with the infested person or indirectly through personal items, such as combs, hats, scarfs, beddings and towels [ 5 ]. Pediculosis capitis presents a public health problem [ 6 ] as it can cause social stigma, embarrassment, low self-esteem, loss of productivity, and frustration among afflicted individuals [ 7 ]. It is not generally associated with morbidity [ 7 ] and is not currently considered to be vectors for human pathogens [ 8 ], but secondary bacterial infections may occur as a result of subsequent skin excoriation due to sensitization to louse saliva [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These includes permethrin, pyrethrin, malathion, and lindane. However, their use to control pediculosis globally has been hampered due to the growing issues concerning the aforementioned treatments [ 7 ]. There have been records of resistance in many parts of the world due to a large treatment selection pressure induced by conventional pediculicides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pediculosis, commonly referred to as head lice (Pediculus humanus capitis) infestation is common and endemic worldwide, and affects persons of all socioeconomic backgrounds and ages (Greive and Barnes, 2012). It is a prevalent and contagious condition afflicting mostly children between three to ten years old (Samuel et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It usually affects school-age children and can be transmitted through direct head-tohead contact. It is not generally associated with morbidity apart from secondary bacterial infections but they may cause social stigma, embarrassment, low self-esteem, lost productivity and frustration among all involved (Greive and Barnes, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%