2023
DOI: 10.3390/coatings13101775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Characterization of Doped Bioglass 45S5/HAp Coatings Obtained by CoBlastTM Deposition

Ana Sofia Pádua,
Sílvia Rodrigues Gavinho,
Tânia Vieira
et al.

Abstract: Bone replacement is one of the major medical procedures in the oral surgery field due to the progressive ageing population and to illness or trauma in younger age groups. The use of implants without biological activity and effective osseointegration increases the chances of implant failure. This work aims to improve the interaction between implants and bone by using Bioglass 45S5 (BG)/hydroxyapatite (HAp) mixtures, including copper-, zinc-, and cerium-doped BG, as well as co-doping by the mentioned metals, as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the material and antibacterial agent is crucial to guarantee both an effective action against microorganisms and harmlessness to the human body, and in the best case, favorable biological activity (osteoconduction, osteointegration, etc.) [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the material and antibacterial agent is crucial to guarantee both an effective action against microorganisms and harmlessness to the human body, and in the best case, favorable biological activity (osteoconduction, osteointegration, etc.) [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weak bone regeneration and the risk of instability during the healing phase have been recognized as significant challenges in the field of implantology [1][2][3]. Surface treatments that improve surface roughness have been an important strategy for increasing osseointegration, allowing for a stronger bond between the implant and the surrounding bone tissue [4][5][6]. However, this strategy may not be sufficient to assure long-term implant success, especially in situations where inflammatory reactions can result in bone support loss and implant failure [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent findings emphasize the need to integrate biocompatibility, osseointegration, tissue regeneration, and other biological factors as fundamental components of successful implant design [ 3 , 4 ]. The realization that clinical outcomes are intricately linked to the interaction of the implant with the biological fluid has prompted advancements in materials and surface modifications [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in coating implants with bioactive materials to enhance biological performance including biocompatibility, osseointegration, and tissue regeneration, therefore ensuring enhanced longevity, stability, and overall success in clinical applications [ 7 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%