2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro characterization of a controlled-release ocular insert for delivery of brimonidine tartrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the histological evaluation of the retina and cornea was performed on the thermogel-treated eyes. Both soluble PEG and biodegradable PLGA blocks have low cytotoxicity, and have been approved by FDA to use in clinic [60][61][62]. Moreover, some marketed intravitreal implants are also constructed based on PLGA [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the histological evaluation of the retina and cornea was performed on the thermogel-treated eyes. Both soluble PEG and biodegradable PLGA blocks have low cytotoxicity, and have been approved by FDA to use in clinic [60][61][62]. Moreover, some marketed intravitreal implants are also constructed based on PLGA [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have modified the conventional oil‐in‐water emulsion technique to synthesize core‐shell microspheres that encapsulated high loadings of BT, and enabled sustained in vitro release of BT over 1 month with minimal initial burst release. Our mild synthesis process also managed to encapsulate the BT without affecting its efficacy, as the in vivo release of microspheres‐encapsulated BT successfully reduced IOP for over 50 d. While others have attempted to deliver BT to treat glaucoma using subconjunctival implants, results have been limited to 4 weeks even in cases where microsphere systems were used …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the BT‐loaded M/CS may be implanted in the subconjunctiva, and may be periodically replaced when the BT release is complete (Figure S1, Supporting Information). Subconjunctival implants have been previously used to deliver drugs for conditions such as uveitis and glaucoma for extended periods of up to 1 month without damage to surrounding tissue . Biodegradable polymer films have also been implanted in the subconjunctiva for up to 6 months without surrounding tissue damage or inflammation, confirming the safety of the subconjunctival location for long‐term implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…So many attempts were performed in the history to fix this problem in ophthalmic drug delivery. The literature survey reveals that the intraocular bioavailability of topically applied drugs is ranging from 5-10% of total administered, which is extremely poor 4,5 . Therefore, there is a need for controlled or sustained ocular drug delivery system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%