2008
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01389-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Capability of Faropenem To Select for Resistant Mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae

Abstract: When tested against nine strains of pneumococci and six of Haemophilus influenzae of various resistotypes, faropenem failed to select for resistant mutants after 50 days of consecutive subculture in subinhibitory concentrations. Faropenem also yielded low rates of spontaneous mutations against all organisms of both species. By comparison, resistant clones were obtained with macrolides, ketolides, and quinolones.Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading bacterial cause of community-acquired pneumonia. The inciden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other mutations (A1284G and T1325C) have not been described so far. In addition, in two isolates with an MIC of 512 mg/L, we found mutations in the ribosomal protein 4, namely, Q65R (never described) and G69R, previously reported in macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae ( Clark et al, 2007 ; Kosowska-Shick et al, 2008 ), linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis ( Mendes et al, 2012 ), and CF macrolide-resistant Burkholderia multivorans (G70R; corresponding position) ( Silva et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Other mutations (A1284G and T1325C) have not been described so far. In addition, in two isolates with an MIC of 512 mg/L, we found mutations in the ribosomal protein 4, namely, Q65R (never described) and G69R, previously reported in macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae ( Clark et al, 2007 ; Kosowska-Shick et al, 2008 ), linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis ( Mendes et al, 2012 ), and CF macrolide-resistant Burkholderia multivorans (G70R; corresponding position) ( Silva et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…All isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin and telithromycin, agents that are unlikely to be widely used in children because of safety concerns and because telithromycin is not available in pediatric formulation. Faropenem appears to be a possible option for treating pediatric infections because it has low potential for resistance development (21), provided it achieves adequate in vivo activity against U.S. pediatric isolates, such as serotype 19A, that are notoriously resistant to other antimicrobial agents (10,11). Phase 3 studies in adults have shown that faropenem has a good safety profile with a low incidence of diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting and no risk of cardiotoxicity or seizures (12,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current investigation, monomicrobial growth was found in 100% of the cases. In another study, monomicrobial growth was found in 91.3% of the cases, and 8.7% were polymicrobial 19 . The exact rate of polymicrobial infection is dependent on the laboratory technique.…”
Section: Escherichia Colimentioning
confidence: 86%