2010
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200905909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Biosynthesis of the Prepeptide of Type‐III Lantibiotic Labyrinthopeptin A2 Including Formation of a CC Bond as a Post‐Translational Modification

Abstract: Lantibiotics are ribosomally synthesized peptide antibiotics containing the amino acids lanthionine (Lan) and methyllanthione (MeLan) as the most important and characteristic post-translational modification.[1] Work on the in vitro characterization of the enzymatic processing of lantibiotics, in particular for the formation of lanthionine, was described in reports on lacticin 481 [2] and haloduracin.[3] Recently, we identified a new family of lantibiotics, named labyrinthopeptins, which are produced by the act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
105
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The leader peptide binding site has been previously shown to not be located in this C-terminal domain (25). The proposed activation mechanism for LanB dehydratases stands in contrast to the activation of the hydroxyl groups of Ser and Thr by phosphorylation during the dehydration process of classes II, III, and IV lanthipeptides (6,7,29). Why glutamylation of Ser/Thr would evolve as an alternative means of Ser/Thr activation is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The leader peptide binding site has been previously shown to not be located in this C-terminal domain (25). The proposed activation mechanism for LanB dehydratases stands in contrast to the activation of the hydroxyl groups of Ser and Thr by phosphorylation during the dehydration process of classes II, III, and IV lanthipeptides (6,7,29). Why glutamylation of Ser/Thr would evolve as an alternative means of Ser/Thr activation is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Class II enzymes are generically named LanMs, which are single polypeptides containing an N-terminal dehydratase domain that bears no homology to any functionally known enzymes and a C-terminal LanC-like cyclase domain (13,14). Class III and class IV synthetases are trifunctional enzymes termed LanKC (15) and LanL (16), respectively. These enzymes contain an N-terminal lyase domain and a central kinase domain but differ in their C termini.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). In some cases, this reaction is coupled with a second Michael-type addition of the resulting enolate to a second dehydroalanine to produce a labionin structure (10). Genetic and biochemical studies have revealed four distinct classes of lanthipeptides according to their biosynthetic machinery (7,11,12) (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For class II lanthipeptides, the reactions are carried out by a single lanthipeptide synthetase, LanM, containing an N-terminal dehydratase domain that bears no homology to LanB, and a C-terminal LanC-like cyclase domain. Class III and class IV lanthipeptides are synthesized by trifunctional enzymes LanKC (10,13) and LanL (12), respectively. These enzymes contain an N-terminal lyase domain and a central kinase domain but differ in their C termini.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%