In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load

Kim, Jae Seon; Raigrodski, Ariel J.; Flinn, Brian D.; Rubenstein, Jeffrey E.; Chung, Kwok Hung; Mancl, Lloyd

doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(13)60054-2

Cited by 72 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Our results are consistent with the findings in a study by Kim et al [20] who found that the use of a metallic element with a zirconia abutment does not guarantee higher fracture resistance.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Bending Moments and Failure of Titanium and Zirconia Abutments with Internal Connections: In Vitro Study

Fern

Massoglia

Catalán

et al. 2016

JDHODT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe replacement of missing anterior tooth with an osseointegrated implant or with a fixed dental prosthesis is part of the routine practice of today dentistry resulting in treatment with high success rates [1]. Titanium abutments are the gold standard in rehabilitation of implants in cases of fixed prosthesis, due to their excellent biologic properties and great biomechanics characteristic. However, metal abutment cause discoloration of the peri-implant mucosa because of its gray color [2,3], putting in risk the esthetic outcome. Taking this problem into account, different ceramic abutments made of zirconia, alumina or other ceramic materials are now available [4].The use of ceramic abutments offers several clinical advantages over metallic abutments. The esthetic outcome is not only related to the similarity of the color peri-implant mucosa between a natural tooth and a zirconia [5], but also with the easiness in manage the color outcome of all ceramic fixed prosthesis [6]. In addition, the biologic properties of zirconia are similar or even better than titanium [7], showing low in-vivo bacterial adhesion [8-10], less peri-implant inflammation [11] and even soft tissue integration [12,13].Implants have different designs of implant abutment connection and the connection of the zirconia abutments to the implant can be carried out by means of the abutment itself or through a secondary metallic element. Several investigations have indicated that the fracture resistance of a ceramic abutment is dependent of the type of implant abutment connection and the presence of a secondary metallic element [14][15][16][17], However, in the current research there is a lack of studies regarding the difference on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments with different combinations of secondary metallic elements, using an internal hexagon connection. Research Article AbstractBackground: The use of Zirconia abutment is increasing in the search of an aesthetic rehabilitation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Bending Moments and Failure of Titanium and Zirconia Abutments with Internal Connections: In Vitro Study

Fern

Massoglia

Catalán

et al. 2016

JDHODT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2) a titanium insert (Ti base) that is bonded to zirconia abutment using resin cement (15) or 3) a titanium collar (sleeve) that is fixed to the apical part of zirconia abutment. These types of abutments are also known as two-piece abutments or hybrid Ti-Zr abutments.…”

Section: Int J Adv Res 5(8) 1156-1168mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The similarity in physical properties of interfacing materials allows for higher mechanical stability and nullified wear potential. (9), (10), (13), (15), (16) These hybrid Ti-Zr abutments combine good esthetics of zirconia with mechanical advantage of all-titanium implant-abutment interface. (17), (18) Why it is important to do this review:-Up to date, there is no consensus on the ideal implant-abutment connection, and with the increased use of ceramic materials to meet the esthetic requirements of the dental patients, the ideal implant-abutment interface design in terms of abutment survival and patient satisfaction should be determined.…”

Section: Int J Adv Res 5(8) 1156-1168mentioning

confidence: 99%

Titanium-Reinforced Zirconia Abutments Versus Pure Zirconia Abutments for Implant-Supported Single Tooth Restorations: A Systematic Review.

BDS¹,

MSDPhD²,

MSDPhD³

2017

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…İmplant abutment arayüzünde zirkonyumun kırılgan özelliklerinin üstesinden gelmek ve zirkonyum abutmentın titanyum implant arayüzünde oluşturduğu aşınmanın önüne geçmek için kişisel olarak hazırlanan zirkonyum gövdenin prefabrike titanyum kaideye adeziv olarak bağlanması ile oluşan iki parçalı, hibrit titanyum-zirkonyum kişisel abutmentlar geliştirilmiştir 41,42 . Hibrit abutmentın titanyum bölümü, implant ile bağlantının stabilitesini sağlarken; kişisel olarak hazırlanmış seramik gövde, doğal çıkış profili ve rengi nedeni ile restorasyonun estetiğini arttırır 19 .…”

Section: Döküm Kişisel Abutmentlarunclassified

“…Hibrit abutmentın titanyum bölümü, implant ile bağlantının stabilitesini sağlarken; kişisel olarak hazırlanmış seramik gövde, doğal çıkış profili ve rengi nedeni ile restorasyonun estetiğini arttırır 19 . Seramik abutmentların aksine hibrit abutmentlar, gelişmiş mekanik özellikleri nedeni ile daha yüksek yorulma direncine sahiptirler [41][42][43][44] . Truninger ve ark.…”

Section: Döküm Kişisel Abutmentlarunclassified

Ki̇şi̇ye Özel Dental İmplant Abutmentlari

Öztürk¹

2015

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load

Cited by 72 publications

References 18 publications

Bending Moments and Failure of Titanium and Zirconia Abutments with Internal Connections: In Vitro Study

Bending Moments and Failure of Titanium and Zirconia Abutments with Internal Connections: In Vitro Study

Titanium-Reinforced Zirconia Abutments Versus Pure Zirconia Abutments for Implant-Supported Single Tooth Restorations: A Systematic Review.

Ki̇şi̇ye Özel Dental İmplant Abutmentlari

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About