2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro assessment of the contact mechanics of reverse-engineered distal humeral hemiarthroplasty prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14 The recent biomechanic study in the cadaveric arms demonstrated that the reverse-engineered distal humeral hemiarthroplasty prostheses did not reproduce the same contact pattern as the native joints, possibly because the prostheses were designed based on distal humeral osseous anatomy from the CT images which is lacked inclusion of the cartilage thickness. 15 For this reason, the authors utilized an osteochondral fragment of the capitellum which was obtained from the surgical debridement to guide for the appropriate morphologic shape and dimension of the surface of the articular portion. Intraoperatively, the conforming surface of the implant with the native bone facilitated the intraoperative placement and aided for accurate positioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 The recent biomechanic study in the cadaveric arms demonstrated that the reverse-engineered distal humeral hemiarthroplasty prostheses did not reproduce the same contact pattern as the native joints, possibly because the prostheses were designed based on distal humeral osseous anatomy from the CT images which is lacked inclusion of the cartilage thickness. 15 For this reason, the authors utilized an osteochondral fragment of the capitellum which was obtained from the surgical debridement to guide for the appropriate morphologic shape and dimension of the surface of the articular portion. Intraoperatively, the conforming surface of the implant with the native bone facilitated the intraoperative placement and aided for accurate positioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loads and boundary conditions were applied to the FE elbow joint models to simulate natural flexion of the joint. The values of these loads and load locations were selected in accordance with previously published studies [ 23 25 ]. To stabilize the elbow joint, constant muscle strength values of 40, 20 and 20 N (at ratios designed to balance flexion and extension moments across the joint) were attached to the bases of triceps, biceps and brachial muscle tendons, respectively, oriented parallel to the axis of the humerus (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography (CT) scans of each fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimen were performed using a GE Discovery CT750 HD scanner (GE Health Care, Pewaukee, WI, USA) at 120 kV and 292 mAs with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm (in-plane pixel sizes ranging from 0.492 -0.586 mm). The CT data was imported into Mimics v14.12 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), and the distal humeral bone geometry was extracted using threshold based segmentation, which included any voxel with an attenuation value of 250 HU or greater 5,23,25 . These threedimensional models were wrapped, exported in the stereolithography (STL) format, and remeshed using a radial basis function in Matlab (The Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA).…”
Section: Reverse-engineered Implant Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Boolean geometry subtract operation was performed using custom Blender script (The Blender Foundation, Amsterdam, NL), which cropped the model to the articular region and created interface geometry for attaching an existing custom humeral stem component. Stainless steel prosthesis prototypes based on these computer models were manufactured using a sPro TM 125 direct metal selective laser melting (SLM) machine (3D Systems Corp., Rock Hill, SC, USA), and polished until a smooth mirror-like finish was obtained on the articular surfaces of the prosthesis 23 .…”
Section: Reverse-engineered Implant Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation