1995
DOI: 10.1093/jac/36.5.839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Yersinia enterocolitica isolates from stools of patients in The Netherlands from 1982–1991

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial growth was quantified by absorbance (A 600nm ) and mCherry fluorescence was quantified in a microplate reader. Treatment with 1µg/ml Dox resulted in significant growth inhibition relative to untreated cells, 0.01µg/ml Dox, and 0.1µg/ml Dox (Figure 1B), which is consistent with previously published Dox minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) levels for Yersinia (2426). Reporter signal was detected with 0.01µg/ml Dox, and significantly increased with 0.1µg/ml Dox; neither lower dose inhibited bacterial growth (Figure 1B, 1C).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Bacterial growth was quantified by absorbance (A 600nm ) and mCherry fluorescence was quantified in a microplate reader. Treatment with 1µg/ml Dox resulted in significant growth inhibition relative to untreated cells, 0.01µg/ml Dox, and 0.1µg/ml Dox (Figure 1B), which is consistent with previously published Dox minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) levels for Yersinia (2426). Reporter signal was detected with 0.01µg/ml Dox, and significantly increased with 0.1µg/ml Dox; neither lower dose inhibited bacterial growth (Figure 1B, 1C).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Stolk-Engelaar et al examined 335 strains and could not associate susceptibility patterns with biovar or serovar [3], but others have found relationships . Previous studies at this laboratory confirmed the latter view, finding a relationship between biovar and susceptibility to ticarcillin, amoxycillin-clavulanate, cefazolin, loracarbef, cefoxitin, ce$odoxime, cefixime and other p-lactam antibiotics (Table 1 To elucidate the molecular basis for the differences in susceptibilities to p-lactam antibiotics of biovar 2, 4 and 5 strains, their P-lactamases were characterised genotypically and phenotypically.…”
Section: Hares Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stolk-Engelaar et al examined strains of all biovars except biovar 5 and found no association between susceptibility and biovar or serovar [11], whereas others have found relationships [9, 10, 21±23]. This group con®rmed the latter view, ®nding a relationship between biovar and susceptibility to several â-lactam antibiotics (Table 1 and [22]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%