2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-014-2176-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro and in vivo characterization of a West Nile virus MAD78 infectious clone

Abstract: The viral determinants governing the varied neuropathogenicity of different West Nile virus (WNV) strains are poorly understood. Here, we generated an infectious clone (WNV-MADIC) of the non-pathogenic strain WNV-MAD78 and compared its replication to that of parental WNV-MAD78 and a WNV-MAD78 infectious clone (WNV-MADTX-UTRs) containing the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of the pathogenic strain WNV-TX. All three viruses replicated at similar rates and caused similar lethality in mice. Thus, the infecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to study the long-term antibody responses during WNV infection in the absence of MAVS, we first determined that MAVS-deficient mice can survive a non-pathogenic WNV-MAD infection (Fig 1). In contrast, IFNAR-deficient mice die after footpad inoculation with 100 PFU of WNV-MAD [11]; furthermore, WNV-MAD can be lethal when inoculated intracranially into WT mice [19,20]. The fact that MAVS -/- mice control WNV-MAD infection and IFNAR -/- mice do not [11], is most likely due to the fact that MAVS -/- mice still make type I IFN after WNV infection, possibly downstream of TLR activation, and thus, presumably utilize the IFNAR pathway for protection [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study the long-term antibody responses during WNV infection in the absence of MAVS, we first determined that MAVS-deficient mice can survive a non-pathogenic WNV-MAD infection (Fig 1). In contrast, IFNAR-deficient mice die after footpad inoculation with 100 PFU of WNV-MAD [11]; furthermore, WNV-MAD can be lethal when inoculated intracranially into WT mice [19,20]. The fact that MAVS -/- mice control WNV-MAD infection and IFNAR -/- mice do not [11], is most likely due to the fact that MAVS -/- mice still make type I IFN after WNV infection, possibly downstream of TLR activation, and thus, presumably utilize the IFNAR pathway for protection [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, its genetic and antigenic analysis characterized it as a neuropathogenic lineage 1 strainBondre et al, 2007;Sapkal et al, 2011). To understand the molecular mechanism of pathogenesis of encephalitic flaviviruses, viral clones established through reverse genetics system are essentially explored in the identification of virulence determinants(Yamschchikov et al, 2001b;Hussmann et al, 2014). The viral infectious cDNA clones are helpful in introduction of single or multiple genetic modifications in its genome and analyzing the phenotypic impact on the recombinant virus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%