1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(97)85415-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro and in vivo predictors of the anti-emetic activity of tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following in-vitro testing, the NK1 antagonists were tested in the NK1 agonist-induced foot-tapping assay, used routinely to measure the ability of NK1 antagonists to cross the blood-brain barrier, bind to the gerbil NK1 receptor, and block the central actions of a NK1 agonist (Bristow and Young 1994;Rupniak and Williams 1994;Rupniak et al 1997). The five NK1 antagonists attenuated NK1 agonist-induced foot-tapping, albeit with differing potencies, confirming that these NK1 antagonists had oral bioavailability and brain penetration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following in-vitro testing, the NK1 antagonists were tested in the NK1 agonist-induced foot-tapping assay, used routinely to measure the ability of NK1 antagonists to cross the blood-brain barrier, bind to the gerbil NK1 receptor, and block the central actions of a NK1 agonist (Bristow and Young 1994;Rupniak and Williams 1994;Rupniak et al 1997). The five NK1 antagonists attenuated NK1 agonist-induced foot-tapping, albeit with differing potencies, confirming that these NK1 antagonists had oral bioavailability and brain penetration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Briefly, pretreatment with CNS penetrant NK1 antagonists blocks the rhythmic hind foot-tapping produced when the selective NK1 receptor agonist, GR-73632 , is administered into the CNS via intracerebroventricular (icv) injection (Bristow and Young 1994;Rupniak and Williams 1994;Rupniak et al 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The antiemetic action of NK 1 receptor antagonists appears central because: 1) brain penetration is required for activity [49]; 2) central injection of CNS penetrant or non-penetrant NK 1 receptor antagonists prevents emesis produced by the peripheral administration of cisplatin [21,54]; and 3) there is strong correspondence in the rank order of potency between NK 1 receptor antagonists' ID 50 s for their antiemetic activity in ferrets, and their ability to suppress foot tappings in gerbils induced by centrally injected NK 1 receptor selective agonists [35,49,51]. These models have been used concomitantly as indices for CNS penetration, antagonist activity, and CNS-mediated antiemetic potential of NK 1 receptor antagonists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Involvement of substance P and NK 1 has been suggested in the generation of delayed emesis following the treatment with chemotherapeutic agents (20). Recent studies further demonstrated the suppression of delayed emesis by aprepitant in both humans and animals (4,5,10), although brain-nonpenetrating NK 1 antagonists are ineffective (21). Cisplatin induced long-lasting emesis in ferrets for 72 h. T-2328 inhibited the cisplatin-induced delayed emesis by i.v.…”
Section: Gr73632-induced Foot Tapping In Gerbilsmentioning
confidence: 99%