1994
DOI: 10.1128/aac.38.5.1118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of KRM-1648 and KRM-1657, new rifamycin derivatives

Abstract: The in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of the new rifamycin derivatives KRM-1648 and KRM-1657 were compared with those of rifampin. Rifabutin, ciprofloxacin, and clarithromycin were also tested for reference. The respective MICs of KRM-1648 and KRM-1657 for 90% of the strains tested (MIC90s) were 0.016 and 0.0078 ,ug/ml, respectively, for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, 0.016 and 0.0039 ,ug/ml, respectively, for methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and 0.0625 and 0.016 ,ug/ml, respective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rifalazil has greater potency against Chlamydia than rifampin, which is in contrast to the equivalent MICs that rifampin and rifalazil have against some gram-positive pathogens such as S. aureus (5). The results showing that rifalazil retains activity against Chlamydia strains that are resistant to rifampin was unanticipated, particularly in light of the crossresistance of a high proportion of clinical isolates of both S. (7,10,18,19) and S. aureus (16,17) as well as laboratory isolates of S. aureus (9) are shown within the conserved regions of RpoB known to be involved in resistance to rifampin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Rifalazil has greater potency against Chlamydia than rifampin, which is in contrast to the equivalent MICs that rifampin and rifalazil have against some gram-positive pathogens such as S. aureus (5). The results showing that rifalazil retains activity against Chlamydia strains that are resistant to rifampin was unanticipated, particularly in light of the crossresistance of a high proportion of clinical isolates of both S. (7,10,18,19) and S. aureus (16,17) as well as laboratory isolates of S. aureus (9) are shown within the conserved regions of RpoB known to be involved in resistance to rifampin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Furthermore, KRM is known to exhibit potent activity in vitro and in vivo against gram-positive bacteria (3, 23) but is not effective against gram-negative bacteria or rapidly growing mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium fortuitum (3,14,23). The spectrum of activity of KRM against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria is nearly the same as that of RMP (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Rifamycins, such as rifampin (RIF), rifabutin (RFB), and rifapentine, inhibit bacterial RNA polymerases isolated from a wide variety of microorganisms (4,8,9,10,21,37,38). This class of drugs has been used in the clinic as one component of multiple drug therapy, predominantly to treat tuberculosis (27) and to treat serious gram-positive infections (15,32,48).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%