2020
DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.01396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Analytical Approaches to Study Plant Ligand-Receptor Interactions

Abstract: An overview of state-of-the-art in vitro methods details receptor-ligand interactions, highlighting experiment recommendations, as well as advantages and limitations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, none of these MAMPs/DAMPs, including cello-, laminari-, xyloglucan-, mannan-and arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides, have a single candidate PRR for their perception, whose elucidation will require the combination of heavy biochemical and genetic approaches. In particular, biomolecular interaction assays with pure ECDs of putative receptors have been shown to be the golden standard to allow quantification of potential MAMP/DAMP-ECD binding (Sandoval and Santiago, 2020). However, these approaches are time consuming and resource demanding, thus high-throughput screenings based on these technologies are of high risk and not always affordable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, none of these MAMPs/DAMPs, including cello-, laminari-, xyloglucan-, mannan-and arabinoxylo-oligosaccharides, have a single candidate PRR for their perception, whose elucidation will require the combination of heavy biochemical and genetic approaches. In particular, biomolecular interaction assays with pure ECDs of putative receptors have been shown to be the golden standard to allow quantification of potential MAMP/DAMP-ECD binding (Sandoval and Santiago, 2020). However, these approaches are time consuming and resource demanding, thus high-throughput screenings based on these technologies are of high risk and not always affordable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these results and to further clarify this issue, we expressed CERK1 and LYK4 Arabidopsis ECDs in insect cells and purified them by affinity chromatography (Figure S4). Then, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments (Sandoval and Santiago, 2020) were carried out to confirm the in silico binding predictions of both CERK1-dependent ligands 1,4-b-D-(GlcNAc) 6 and 1,3-b-D-(Glc) 6 . Our ITC results proved direct interactions of CERK1 with 1,4-b-D-(GlcNac) 6 (K d values of 37.5 AE 10.0 µM; Figure 5).…”
Section: Computational Prediction Methods For the Identification Of Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AtDORN1, an L-type lectin receptor kinase that mediates the perception of extracellular ATP in Arabidopsis, binds radiolabeled ATP after recombinant expression in Escherichia coli bacteria (Choi et al, 2014). Many other techniques to study biomolecular interactions have been applied in plant receptor research, such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR), microscale thermophoresis (MST), and grating-coupled interferometry (GCI), all of which have their specific advantages and disadvantages (Sandoval and Santiago, 2020). While such methods allow quantification of binding properties, many of them require large amounts of purified receptor protein or ligand labelling, as well as specialized facilities, costly equipment or expensive consumables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using RLK/RLP loss-or gain-of-function approaches, are instrumental in identifying potential ligand-receptor pairs, but additional methods are required to prove a direct interaction between a ligand and its receptor. Various different methods have been used to assess ligand binding to plant receptors (Sandoval and Santiago, 2020). The flg22-FLS2 interaction has been demonstrated, for example, by radioligand binding assay and chemical cross-linking using immunoprecipitated receptors from Arabidopsis and AtFLS2-exressing tomato cells (Chinchilla et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, assessing ligand-receptor interactions requires more integrative and quantitative approaches, including biophysical methods to measure membrane receptor dynamics and oligomerization state upon ligand binding. Sandoval and Santiago (2020) overview the state-ofthe-art in vitro ligand-binding assays used to investigate receptor-ligand interactions. Among these, new structure-based ligand-binding technologies have emerged as powerful methods to uncover key residues and conformational changes of the receptors upon ligand binding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%