1978
DOI: 10.1128/aac.13.5.759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Activity of Rifampin Alone and in Combination with Nafcillin and Vancomycin Against Pathogenic Strains of Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: Twenty strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients with endocarditis were examined in vitro for susceptibility to rifampin, nafcillin, and vancomycin and to combinations of rifampin with nafcillin or vancomycin. Minimum bactericidal concentrations of rifampin ranged from 0.0031 to 0.0125 yg/ml, of nafcillin ranged from 0.078 to 0.312 ,ug/ml, and of vancomycin ranged from 0.312 to 1.25 pg/ml. The combination of rifampin with nafcillin was synergistic for 12 strains; the combination of rifampin plus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rifampin never achieved a bactericidal effect in either phase. While rifampin has usually been considered an antistaphylococcal bactericidal agent (28,35,41), some authors have reported results consistent with our own (3, 9, 17). In contrast, levofloxacin reached a potent killing rate in the log phase and it also showed bactericidal activity in the stationary phase, although higher concentrations than those for the exponential phase were required.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Rifampin never achieved a bactericidal effect in either phase. While rifampin has usually been considered an antistaphylococcal bactericidal agent (28,35,41), some authors have reported results consistent with our own (3, 9, 17). In contrast, levofloxacin reached a potent killing rate in the log phase and it also showed bactericidal activity in the stationary phase, although higher concentrations than those for the exponential phase were required.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For example, vancomycin penetration into lung tissue is not sustained, and the same was seen for the meninges and infected bone, whereas rifampin easily penetrates these tissues (61,109,120). The rifampin-vancomycin in vitro interaction appears to range from antagonistic to indifferent, with very few synergistic studies (25,26,112,119,158,218,246,251,258,261). Tuazon et al showed that the rifampin-vancomycin combination had "partial synergism" with only 25% of the MSSA isolates, with the remainder being indifferent, while the nafcillin-rifampin combination had "partial synergism" for 60% of the isolates (246).…”
Section: Staphylococcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rifampin-vancomycin in vitro interaction appears to range from antagonistic to indifferent, with very few synergistic studies (25,26,112,119,158,218,246,251,258,261). Tuazon et al showed that the rifampin-vancomycin combination had "partial synergism" with only 25% of the MSSA isolates, with the remainder being indifferent, while the nafcillin-rifampin combination had "partial synergism" for 60% of the isolates (246). Watanakunakorn and Guerriero showed antagonism for 43 of 50 S. aureus strains using the rifampin-vancomycin combination.…”
Section: Staphylococcimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations