2013
DOI: 10.1530/boneabs.1.pp207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro 3D osteoblast-osteocyte co-culture mechanical loading model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypoxia-induced self-assembly of the endosteum-like layer is particularly noteworthy, as it has not been observed in any other culture system reported to date. [30][31][32]37,38 Second, hypoxia significantly enhanced the gene expressions of SOST and FGF23, while decreasing that of ALPL. Taking culture conditions separately, replacing traditional normoxic 2D cultures with hypoxia significantly increased SOST expression by fourfold, while introducing the 3D configuration to the traditional 2D normoxic cultures significantly increased SOST by twofold (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This hypoxia-induced self-assembly of the endosteum-like layer is particularly noteworthy, as it has not been observed in any other culture system reported to date. [30][31][32]37,38 Second, hypoxia significantly enhanced the gene expressions of SOST and FGF23, while decreasing that of ALPL. Taking culture conditions separately, replacing traditional normoxic 2D cultures with hypoxia significantly increased SOST expression by fourfold, while introducing the 3D configuration to the traditional 2D normoxic cultures significantly increased SOST by twofold (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although some coculture models have been established to research the direct (physical) intercellular communication in mechanotransduction, they still have a lot of limitations due to osteocytes' special morphological characteristics and special location in bone. The trabecular bone explant model and the 3D osteoblast-osteocyte coculture model could simulate in vivo intercellular communication between embedded osteocytes and surface-residing osteoblasts very well (Mitsiades et al 2000;Chan et al 2009;Vazquez et al 2011Vazquez et al , 2012. However, they are difficult not only to operate but also to quantitatively research, as well as it is not easy to retrieve osteocytes and osteoblasts respectively for the next experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, several experiments using conditioned medium (i.e. supernatant containing soluble factors from osteocytes) (155,156) or different co-culture methodologies (155,157,158), in 2D substrate or in 3D gels (158,159), support the concept that osteocytes regulate the function of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Moreover, considerable convincing data emphasize the role of osteocytes as mechanosensors, integrating mechanical signals to regulate bone mass (153).…”
Section: Complex 3d Models: Cell Co-culturementioning
confidence: 94%