2011
DOI: 10.3397/1.3598380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-vehicle speech intelligibility for different driving conditions using the Speech Transmission Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the STI is also more measurement intensive, as it involves measurements of amplitude modulation transfer functions 6 or impulse responses 31,32 to characterize reverberation. For listening in vehicles, the effects of reverberation are negligible and speech intelligibility, as quantified by the STI, is primarily limited by the long-term average characteristics of the background noise 23 .…”
Section: Predictions Of Traditional Speech Intelligibility Metrics 21...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the STI is also more measurement intensive, as it involves measurements of amplitude modulation transfer functions 6 or impulse responses 31,32 to characterize reverberation. For listening in vehicles, the effects of reverberation are negligible and speech intelligibility, as quantified by the STI, is primarily limited by the long-term average characteristics of the background noise 23 .…”
Section: Predictions Of Traditional Speech Intelligibility Metrics 21...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the SII, scores > 0.75 are usually taken as indicating good speech communication, while poor communication systems have an SII < 0.45 5 . STI scores for speech in car noise have been interpreted in the following way: > 0.75 -good or excellent speech communication; 0.6 to 0.75 -good communication; 0.45 to 0.6 -fair communication; 0.3 to 0.45 -poor communication; <0.3 -almost no intelligibility 23,24,25 .…”
Section: Predictions Of Traditional Speech Intelligibility Metrics 21...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lee et al 11 revealed that engine and mechanical/electrical noises mainly comprise luxury vehicle noise and analyzed the contribution ratio of each source to the sound quality of interior noise using subjective sound quality correlation and objective parameters. Samardzic and Novak 12 devised a sound quality objective quantification model, which was applied to a commercial vehicle through numerous subjective and objective evaluation tests. Yoon et al 13 studied the sound quality of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system of a vehicle using a neural network model and subsequently built a subjectivity and objectivity correlation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%